Akita Keitaro, Kohno Takashi, Kohsaka Shun, Shiraishi Yasuyuki, Nagatomo Yuji, Izumi Yuki, Goda Ayumi, Mizuno Atsushi, Sawano Mitsuaki, Inohara Taku, Fukuda Keiichi, Yoshikawa Tsutomu
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.
Int J Cardiol. 2017 May 15;235:162-168. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.02.070. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
Acute heart failure (HF) is a frequently encountered cardiac condition. Its prevalence increases exponentially with age. In spite of this, elderly patients are underrepresented in clinical trials and the implementation of guideline-based medical therapy (GBMT) in them is not well established. We investigated the current use of GBMT and its effects on mortality and HF rehospitalization among elderly patients with acute HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) using data obtained from a contemporary multi-center registry.
We analyzed data from 1,441 consecutive acute HF patients registered in the West Tokyo Heart Failure (WET-HF) registry (mean age 73.2 ± 13.6 years). Reduced ejection fraction (<45%) was noted in 803 patients (55.7%), of which 237 were aged ≥80 years (elderly group). The prescription rate of GBMT (use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors and β-blockers at discharge) was significantly lower in the elderly than in the younger (aged < 80 years) group (46.8% vs. 66.9%, p<0.001). Although GBMT at discharge was associated with reductions in HF readmission or the composite endpoint of cardiac death and HF readmission (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.30-0.80; and HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.32-0.89, respectively) in the younger group, this association was not observed in the elderly group (HR 1.41, 95% CI 0.68-2.92; and HR 1.54, 95% CI 0.76-3.13, respectively) CONCLUSIONS: GBMT implementation in elderly patients with HFrEF was found to be suboptimal. However, the underuse of GBMT did not appear to be responsible for poorer outcomes in elderly HFrEF patients. Further research is required to establish an ideal therapeutic approach for this population.
URL: http://www.umin.ac.jp/icdr/index-j.html. Unique identifier: UMIN000001171.
急性心力衰竭(HF)是一种常见的心脏疾病。其患病率随年龄呈指数增长。尽管如此,老年患者在临床试验中的代表性不足,基于指南的药物治疗(GBMT)在他们中的应用尚未得到充分确立。我们使用从当代多中心登记处获得的数据,调查了GBMT在射血分数降低(HFrEF)的老年急性HF患者中的当前使用情况及其对死亡率和HF再住院率的影响。
我们分析了在东京西部心力衰竭(WET-HF)登记处登记的1441例连续急性HF患者的数据(平均年龄73.2±13.6岁)。803例患者(55.7%)射血分数降低(<45%),其中237例年龄≥80岁(老年组)。老年组GBMT(出院时使用肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂和β受体阻滞剂)的处方率显著低于年轻(年龄<80岁)组(46.8%对66.9%,p<0.001)。尽管出院时GBMT与年轻组HF再入院或心源性死亡和HF再入院的复合终点降低相关(HR 0.49,95%CI 0.30-0.80;和HR 0.53,95%CI 0.32-0.89),但在老年组中未观察到这种关联(HR 1.41,95%CI 0.68-2.92;和HR 1.54,95%CI 0.76-3.13)。结论:发现HFrEF老年患者中GBMT的实施不理想。然而,GBMT使用不足似乎不是老年HFrEF患者预后较差的原因。需要进一步研究为该人群建立理想的治疗方法。
网址:http://www.umin.ac.jp/icdr/index-j.html。唯一标识符:UMIN000001171。