• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

供体-受体大小匹配与心脏移植术后死亡率:体重指数和性别影响。

Donor-recipient size matching and mortality in heart transplantation: Influence of body mass index and gender.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA; International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation, Dallas, Texas, USA.

出版信息

J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017 Sep;36(9):940-947. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Feb 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.healun.2017.02.002
PMID:28259595
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) guidelines advise against inappropriate weight match (IWM) for heart transplant, defined as donor weight <70% of recipient's weight. Few studies have explored in detail this size-matching recommendation, especially with regard to body mass index (BMI) and gender matching. We aimed to determine whether any difference could be observed between size-matching in obese and non-obese recipients with regard to mortality after cardiac transplantation.

METHODS

Data from 52,455 adult heart transplants (recipients ≥18 years of age) between 1994 and 2013 were obtained from the ISHLT Registry. We defined the following subgroups of patients based on BMI: underweight, BMI <18.5; non-obese, BMI 18.5 to 30; and obese, BMI >30. The end-points were all-cause 30-day mortality and cumulative mortality.

RESULTS

IWM was associated with increased 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01 to 1.43, p = 0.041) and cumulative mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.14, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.22, p < 0.001). In non-obese recipients, IWM was associated with increased 30-day mortality (OR = 1.89, 95% CI 1.48 to 2.41, p < 0.001) as well as cumulative mortality (HR = 1.27, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.41, p < 0.001), whereas, for obese recipients, IWM was not associated with 30-day or cumulative mortality. Male recipients of female allografts (HR = 1.08, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.12, p < 0.001) as well as female recipients of male allografts (HR = 1.07, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.13, p = 0.003) had increased cumulative mortality compared with gender-matched transplants. There was no interaction between IWM and gender mismatch.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that donor weight <70% of recipient weight increases mortality in non-obese heart transplant recipients, but not in obese transplant recipients. Gender mismatch increases mortality independently of weight match.

摘要

背景

国际心肺移植学会(ISHLT)指南建议避免不适当的体重匹配(IWM)用于心脏移植,定义为供体体重<受体体重的 70%。很少有研究详细探讨这种大小匹配建议,尤其是关于体重指数(BMI)和性别匹配。我们旨在确定在肥胖和非肥胖受体中,在心脏移植后死亡率方面是否可以观察到任何与大小匹配有关的差异。

方法

从 1994 年至 2013 年,从 ISHLT 注册处获得了 52,455 例成年心脏移植(受体≥18 岁)的数据。我们根据 BMI 将患者分为以下亚组:体重不足,BMI<18.5;非肥胖,BMI 18.5 至 30;肥胖,BMI>30。终点是全因 30 天死亡率和累积死亡率。

结果

IWM 与 30 天死亡率增加相关(优势比[OR] = 1.20,95%置信区间[CI] 1.01 至 1.43,p = 0.041)和累积死亡率增加(风险比[HR] = 1.14,95%CI 1.07 至 1.22,p<0.001)。在非肥胖受体中,IWM 与 30 天死亡率增加相关(OR = 1.89,95%CI 1.48 至 2.41,p<0.001)以及累积死亡率增加(HR = 1.27,95%CI 1.15 至 1.41,p<0.001),而对于肥胖受体,IWM 与 30 天或累积死亡率无关。女性受体接受男性同种异体移植物(HR = 1.08,95%CI 1.04 至 1.12,p<0.001)以及男性受体接受女性同种异体移植物(HR = 1.07,95%CI 1.02 至 1.13,p = 0.003)与性别匹配的移植相比,累积死亡率增加。IWM 和性别不匹配之间没有相互作用。

结论

我们的结果表明,供体体重<受体体重的 70%会增加非肥胖心脏移植受体的死亡率,但不会增加肥胖移植受体的死亡率。性别不匹配会增加死亡率,而与体重匹配无关。

相似文献

1
Donor-recipient size matching and mortality in heart transplantation: Influence of body mass index and gender.供体-受体大小匹配与心脏移植术后死亡率:体重指数和性别影响。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017 Sep;36(9):940-947. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
2
Donor/recipient sex mismatch and survival after heart transplantation: only an issue in male recipients? An analysis of the Spanish Heart Transplantation Registry.心脏移植供体/受体性别不匹配与生存情况:仅在男性受体中是个问题吗?西班牙心脏移植登记处的分析
Transpl Int. 2015 Mar;28(3):305-13. doi: 10.1111/tri.12488. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
3
Impact of donor-to-recipient weight ratio on survival after heart transplantation: analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing Database.供体与受体体重比在心脏移植术后生存中的影响:器官共享联合网络数据库分析
Circulation. 2008 Sep 30;118(14 Suppl):S83-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.756866.
4
Interaction of older donor age and survival after weight-matched pediatric heart transplantation.老年供体年龄与体重匹配的儿科心脏移植后存活的相互作用。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017 May;36(5):554-558. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2016.11.009. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
5
Three-year survival rates for all consecutive heart-only and lung-only transplants performed in Eurotransplant, 1997-1999.1997年至1999年在欧洲移植组织进行的所有连续单纯心脏移植和单纯肺移植的三年生存率。
Clin Transpl. 2003:89-100.
6
Predicted heart mass is the optimal metric for size match in heart transplantation.预计心脏质量是心脏移植中大小匹配的最佳指标。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019 Feb;38(2):156-165. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2018.09.017. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
7
Assessing predicted heart mass size matching in obese heart transplant recipients.评估肥胖心脏移植受者预测的心脏质量大小匹配情况。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2021 Aug;40(8):805-813. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2021.04.020. Epub 2021 May 12.
8
Impact of predicted heart mass-based size matching on survival after heart transplantation in Korea: Analysis of the Korean Organ Transplant Registry.基于预测的心脏质量匹配对韩国心脏移植后生存的影响:韩国器官移植登记处的分析。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2022 Dec;41(12):1751-1760. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2022.09.008. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
9
Cardiac size and sex-matching in heart transplantation : size matters in matters of sex and the heart.心脏移植中的心脏大小与性别匹配:在性别与心脏问题上,大小很重要。
JACC Heart Fail. 2014 Feb;2(1):73-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2013.09.005.
10
The impact of donor-recipient sex matching on survival after orthotopic heart transplantation: analysis of 18 000 transplants in the modern era.供体-受体性别匹配对原位心脏移植术后生存的影响:现代18000例移植分析
Circ Heart Fail. 2009 Sep;2(5):401-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.108.844183. Epub 2009 Jul 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex-mismatching in isolated heart transplantation confers no postoperative risk.孤立性心脏移植中的性别不匹配不会带来术后风险。
JHLT Open. 2024 Sep 23;6:100158. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlto.2024.100158. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Reference values of strain-derived myocardial work indices in heart transplant patients.心脏移植患者应变衍生心肌工作指数的参考值
Eur Heart J Imaging Methods Pract. 2024 Aug 30;2(3):qyae091. doi: 10.1093/ehjimp/qyae091. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
Impact of Donor-Recipient BMI Ratio on Survival Outcomes of Heart Transplant Recipients: A Retrospective Analysis Study.
供受者 BMI 比值对心脏移植受者生存结局的影响:一项回顾性分析研究。
Clin Cardiol. 2024 Sep;47(9):e70010. doi: 10.1002/clc.70010.
4
BOMS: blockchain-enabled organ matching system.BOMS:基于区块链的器官匹配系统。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 11;14(1):16069. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66375-5.
5
Sex and Gender-related Disparities in Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes in Heart Transplantation.心脏移植中与性别相关的临床特征和结局的性别差异。
Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2024 Aug;21(4):367-378. doi: 10.1007/s11897-024-00670-0. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
6
Sex Differences in Cardiac Transplantation.心脏移植中的性别差异。
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2023 Dec;25(12):995-1001. doi: 10.1007/s11883-023-01169-0. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
7
Indexed donor cardiac output for improved size matching in heart transplantation: A United Network for Organ Sharing database analysis.用于改善心脏移植中供体与受体大小匹配的指数化供体心输出量:器官共享联合网络数据库分析
JTCVS Open. 2023 May 12;15:291-299. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.04.021. eCollection 2023 Sep.
8
Choosing wisely: incorporating appropriate donor-recipient size matching in heart transplantation.明智选择:在心脏移植中纳入合适的供受者体型匹配。
Heart Fail Rev. 2023 Jul;28(4):967-975. doi: 10.1007/s10741-023-10299-1. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
9
Donor heart selection: Evidence-based guidelines for providers.供心选择:供者评估的循证临床实践指南
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2023 Jan;42(1):7-29. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2022.08.030. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
10
A Holistic View of Advanced Heart Failure.晚期心力衰竭的整体观
Life (Basel). 2022 Aug 24;12(9):1298. doi: 10.3390/life12091298.