Sun Bing, Brooks Eric D, Komaki Ritsuko, Liao Zhongxing, Jeter Melenda, McAleer Mary, Balter Peter A, Welsh James D, O'Reilly Michael, Gomez Daniel, Hahn Stephen M, Sepesi Boris, Rice David C, Heymach John V, Chang Joe Y
Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
J Thorac Oncol. 2017 Jun;12(6):983-992. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.02.018. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
Our goal was to evaluate stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) as a salvage option for isolated recurrence of NSCLC in the lung parenchyma after definitive treatment of stage I to III disease.
Patients who had histologically confirmed, positron emission tomography-staged, isolated NSCLC recurring locally or metastasis in the lung parenchyma (≤3 cm, suitable for SABR) after previous definitive treatment were prospectively enrolled in this trial and treated with volumetric, image-guided SABR to 50 Gy in four fractions. Patients were then followed with computed tomography or positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Primary end points included the pattern of failure after salvage SABR, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS).
Fifty-nine patients with recurrent disease were treated with salvage SABR. The median age was 70 years (range 45-86 years), and the median follow-up time after salvage SABR was 58.3 months. Re-recurrence after salvage SABR developed in 19 patients (32%). Measuring from the date of salvage SABR, the estimated 5-year rates of local, regional, and distant failure were 5.2%, 10.3%, and 22.4%, respectively; the estimated PFS was 46.2% at 3 years and 41.1% at 5 years; and the OS rates were 63.5% at 3 years and 56.5% at 5 years. A high post-SABR neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio was found to predict poor survival. Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events developed in three patients (5%). No patient had a grade 4 or 5 event.
Our study showed that salvage SABR provides excellent 5-year OS, local control, and PFS rates with minimal toxicity for patients with isolated NSCLC recurrence in the lung parenchyma. These results are striking and comparable to historically reported outcomes of patients with primary early-stage NSCLC treated with definitive SABR. SABR appears to be a very effective and safe salvage option for patients with isolated lung parenchyma recurrent disease after definitive treatment and should be considered along with surgery as a potential first-line option for patients with local lung parenchymal recurrent disease.
我们的目标是评估立体定向消融放疗(SABR)作为I至III期疾病明确治疗后肺实质内非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)孤立复发的挽救性治疗选择。
对先前明确治疗后组织学确诊、经正电子发射断层扫描分期、肺实质内出现局部复发或转移(≤3 cm,适合SABR)的孤立性NSCLC患者进行前瞻性纳入本试验,并采用容积图像引导下的SABR分4次给予50 Gy治疗。然后对患者进行计算机断层扫描或正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描随访。主要终点包括挽救性SABR后的失败模式、总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。
59例复发疾病患者接受了挽救性SABR治疗。中位年龄为70岁(范围45 - 86岁),挽救性SABR后的中位随访时间为58.3个月。19例患者(32%)出现挽救性SABR后的再次复发。从挽救性SABR日期开始计算,估计的5年局部、区域和远处失败率分别为5.2%、10.3%和22.4%;3年和5年的估计PFS分别为46.2%和41.1%;3年和5年的OS率分别为63.5%和56.5%。发现SABR后高中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值可预测生存不良。3例患者(5%)发生3级治疗相关不良事件。无患者发生4级或5级事件。
我们的研究表明,挽救性SABR为肺实质内孤立性NSCLC复发患者提供了出色的5年OS、局部控制率和PFS率,且毒性极小。这些结果令人瞩目,与历史上报道的接受明确SABR治疗的原发性早期NSCLC患者的结果相当。SABR似乎是明确治疗后孤立性肺实质复发疾病患者非常有效且安全的挽救性选择,应与手术一起作为局部肺实质复发疾病患者的潜在一线选择加以考虑。