Suppr超能文献

注意力与疼痛:听觉干扰因素是否具有特殊性?

Attention and pain: are auditory distractors special?

作者信息

Sloan Page, Hollins Mark

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina, CB# 3270, Davie Hall, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.

出版信息

Exp Brain Res. 2017 May;235(5):1593-1602. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-4903-x. Epub 2017 Mar 4.

Abstract

It is well established that manipulations of attention and emotional state can modulate pain. Some researchers have used olfactory or visual distractors to manipulate these factors in combination, and have found that attention and emotion have different effects on pain intensity and unpleasantness. Specifically, distraction from pain was found to markedly reduce its intensity while having little effect on its unpleasantness. Other evidence indicates, however, that the strength of intermodal attentional shifts depends on the specific modalities involved, with auditory-somesthetic shifts being relatively weak. The present study was, therefore, undertaken to determine how pain intensity and unpleasantness are affected when auditory, rather than olfactory or visual, distractors are used. Attention was directed either to the pain from noxious thermal stimuli, or to simultaneously presented environmental sounds that had either positive (e.g., bird chirping) or negative (e.g., alarm clock) associations. To manipulate attention, subjects were instructed to make two-alternative forced-choice discrimination judgments concerning the temperature of the thermal stimuli (in heat blocks) or the loudness of the sound clips (in sound blocks). Unpleasant sound clips were used during half of the heat blocks and half of the sound blocks, with pleasant sounds in the other half. Participants rated two components of pain: intensity and unpleasantness, after each block of trials. Although pain unpleasantness was influenced both by attentional direction and by the valence of the sound clips, pain intensity was not affected by either of these experimental manipulations. The failure of auditory distractors to modulate pain intensity differs from the previously documented ability of olfactory distractors to do so. Our findings are, however, consistent with evidence that one can attend simultaneously to auditory and cutaneous stimuli. Thus, environmental sounds are not effective at reducing pain intensity, but are capable of modulating pain unpleasantness, perhaps because it is constructed at a later stage.

摘要

人们已经充分认识到,注意力和情绪状态的调节可以影响疼痛。一些研究人员使用嗅觉或视觉干扰因素来综合操纵这些因素,发现注意力和情绪对疼痛强度和不愉快程度有不同影响。具体而言,分散对疼痛的注意力可显著降低其强度,但对不愉快程度影响不大。然而,其他证据表明,多感官注意力转移的强度取决于所涉及的具体感官模式,听觉 - 躯体感觉转移相对较弱。因此,本研究旨在确定当使用听觉而非嗅觉或视觉干扰因素时,疼痛强度和不愉快程度会受到怎样的影响。注意力要么指向有害热刺激引起的疼痛,要么指向同时呈现的具有积极(如鸟鸣)或消极(如闹钟声)关联的环境声音。为了操纵注意力,受试者被要求对热刺激的温度(在热刺激组)或声音片段的响度(在声音组)进行二选一的强制选择辨别判断。在一半的热刺激组和一半的声音组中使用不愉快的声音片段,另一半使用愉快的声音。在每组试验后,参与者对疼痛的两个组成部分进行评分:强度和不愉快程度。尽管疼痛的不愉快程度受到注意力指向和声音片段效价的影响,但疼痛强度不受这些实验操纵的任何一个影响。听觉干扰因素未能调节疼痛强度,这与先前记录的嗅觉干扰因素的调节能力不同。然而,我们的研究结果与人们可以同时关注听觉和皮肤刺激的证据一致。因此,环境声音在降低疼痛强度方面无效,但能够调节疼痛的不愉快程度,这可能是因为它是在后期构建的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验