• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫内膜癌根治术用于患有子宫内膜癌的女性。

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer.

作者信息

Herling Suzanne Forsyth, Møller Ann M, Palle Connie, Grynnerup Anja, Thomsen Thordis

出版信息

Dan Med J. 2017 Mar;64(3).

PMID:28260596
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy (RALH) has become a widely used approach for women with endometrial cancer and has replaced laparotomy. It has been questioned if the increased costs are justified by superior surgical outcomes. The aim of the present study was to examine the frequency, types and severity of post-operative complications after total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) and RALH using the Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical outcomes.

METHODS

A non-randomised, controlled before and after study of 360 women was conducted; 202 underwent RALH and 158 TAH (historical controls).

RESULTS

RALH had significant advantages compared with TAH: fewer and less severe post-operative complications and a shorter length of hospital stay. The absolute risk reduction for post-operative complications was 13% (95% confidence interval: 4.29-20.87%). Women treated with TAH had significantly more severe complications (grade ≥ 3) than those treated with RALH; 12% versus 3% (p = 0.001). Infections (urinary and port site) were the most frequent post-operative complications overall. The duration of RALH in the operation theatre was longer, while the duration of stay in the post-anaesthesia care unit was shorter for patients undergoing RALH.

CONCLUSIONS

RALH appears advantageous for women treated for endometrial cancer in terms of post-operative complications. We recommend the use of the Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical outcomes for quality assessment.

FUNDING

departmental only.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Danish Health Authority (3-2013-111/1/KAHO).

摘要

引言

机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术(RALH)已成为子宫内膜癌女性广泛采用的手术方式,并已取代剖腹手术。手术成本增加是否因卓越的手术效果而合理,这一点受到了质疑。本研究的目的是使用Clavien-Dindo手术结果分类法,检查全腹子宫切除术(TAH)和RALH术后并发症的发生频率、类型和严重程度。

方法

对360名女性进行了一项非随机、前后对照研究;202例行RALH,158例行TAH(历史对照)。

结果

与TAH相比,RALH具有显著优势:术后并发症更少、更轻,住院时间更短。术后并发症的绝对风险降低了13%(95%置信区间:4.29 - 20.87%)。接受TAH治疗的女性比接受RALH治疗的女性有更严重的并发症(≥3级);分别为12%和3%(p = 0.001)。感染(泌尿系统和切口部位)是总体上最常见的术后并发症。手术室中RALH的手术时间较长,而接受RALH的患者在麻醉后护理单元停留的时间较短。

结论

就术后并发症而言,RALH对接受子宫内膜癌治疗的女性似乎具有优势。我们建议使用Clavien-Dindo手术结果分类法进行质量评估。

资金来源

仅部门资金。

试验注册

丹麦卫生当局(3 - 2013 - 111/1/KAHO)。

相似文献

1
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer.机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫内膜癌根治术用于患有子宫内膜癌的女性。
Dan Med J. 2017 Mar;64(3).
2
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer - complications, women´s experiences, quality of life and a health economic evaluation.机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术治疗子宫内膜癌女性患者——并发症、女性患者体验、生活质量及卫生经济学评估
Dan Med J. 2016 Jul;63(7).
3
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy seems safe in women with early-stage endometrial cancer.机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术对于早期子宫内膜癌女性患者似乎是安全的。
Dan Med J. 2015 Aug;62(8):A5109.
4
Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer.机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术与全腹子宫切除术及淋巴结清扫术治疗子宫内膜癌的对比
Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Dec;111(3):412-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.08.025. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
5
Cost-analysis of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer and atypical complex hyperplasia.机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术与经腹全子宫切除术治疗子宫内膜癌和非典型复杂性增生女性的成本分析
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016 Mar;95(3):299-308. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12820. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
6
Outcomes in women undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy at a tertiary hospital in Western Australia.在西澳大利亚一家三级医院,接受机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术的女性与接受传统腹腔镜子宫切除术的女性的治疗结果比较。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Aug;58(4):443-448. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12749. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
7
Classification of Postoperative Complications in Robotic-assisted Compared With Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer.机器人辅助与腹腔镜子宫内膜癌根治术术后并发症的分类
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Nov-Dec;23(7):1181-1188. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.08.832. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
8
Influence of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy on vaginal cuff healing and brachytherapy initiation in endometrial carcinoma patients.机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术对子宫内膜癌患者阴道残端愈合及近距离放疗起始的影响。
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2016 Jul-Aug;6(4):226-232. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2015.09.015.
9
Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.机器人辅助子宫切除术和淋巴结切除术的学习曲线和手术结果:与腹腔镜和开腹手术治疗子宫内膜癌的病例对照比较。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 Nov-Dec;17(6):739-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.07.008.
10
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer: Analysis of surgical performance.机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术及淋巴结清扫术治疗子宫内膜癌:手术操作分析
Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Dec;115(3):447-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.08.017. Epub 2009 Sep 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Cancer-field surgery for endometrial cancer by robotic peritoneal mesometrial resection and targeted compartmental lymphadenectomy (PMMR+TCL).通过机器人腹膜子宫系膜切除术和靶向分区淋巴结清扫术(PMMR+TCL)进行子宫内膜癌的癌灶手术。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2025 Jan;36(1):e13. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e13. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
2
Robot-Assisted Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Different Classes of Obesity: A Cohort Study.机器人辅助全腹腔镜子宫切除术在不同肥胖程度中的应用:一项队列研究。
JSLS. 2022 Jan-Mar;26(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2021.00077.