Argilés Josep M, Betancourt Angelica, Guàrdia-Olmos Joan, Peró-Cebollero Maribel, López-Soriano Francisco J, Madeddu Clelia, Serpe Roberto, Busquets Sílvia
Cancer Research Group, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biomedicine, Faculty of Biology, University of BarcelonaBarcelona, Spain; Institute of Biomedicine (IBUB)Barcelona, Spain.
Cancer Research Group, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biomedicine, Faculty of Biology, University of Barcelona Barcelona, Spain.
Front Physiol. 2017 Feb 17;8:92. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00092. eCollection 2017.
The CAchexia SCOre (CASCO) was described as a tool for the staging of cachectic cancer patients. The aim of this study is to show the metric properties of CASCO in order to classify cachectic cancer patients into three different groups, which are associated with a numerical scoring. The final aim was to clinically validate CASCO for its use in the classification of cachectic cancer patients in clinical practice. We carried out a case -control study that enrolled prospectively 186 cancer patients and 95 age-matched controls. The score includes five components: (1) body weight loss and composition, (2) inflammation/metabolic disturbances/immunosuppression, (3) physical performance, (4) anorexia, and (5) quality of life. The present study provides clinical validation for the use of the score. In order to show the metric properties of CASCO, three different groups of cachectic cancer patients were established according to the results obtained with the statistical approach used: mild cachexia (15 ≤ × ≤ 28), moderate cachexia (29 ≤ × ≤ 46), and severe cachexia (47 ≤ × ≤ 100). In addition, a simplified version of CASCO, MiniCASCO (MCASCO), was also presented and it contributes as a valid and easy-to-use tool for cachexia staging. Significant statistically correlations were found between CASCO and other validated indexes such as Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) and the subjective diagnosis of cachexia by specialized oncologists. A very significant estimated correlation between CASCO and MCASCO was found that suggests that MCASCO might constitute an easy and valid tool for the staging of the cachectic cancer patients. CASCO and MCASCO provide a new tool for the quantitative staging of cachectic cancer patients with a clear advantage over previous classifications.
恶病质评分(CASCO)被描述为一种用于对恶病质癌症患者进行分期的工具。本研究的目的是展示CASCO的度量属性,以便将恶病质癌症患者分为三个不同组,这些组与一个数值评分相关联。最终目的是在临床实践中对CASCO用于恶病质癌症患者分类进行临床验证。我们进行了一项病例对照研究,前瞻性纳入了186例癌症患者和95例年龄匹配的对照。该评分包括五个组成部分:(1)体重减轻和组成,(2)炎症/代谢紊乱/免疫抑制,(3)身体机能,(4)厌食,以及(5)生活质量。本研究为该评分的使用提供了临床验证。为了展示CASCO的度量属性,根据所使用的统计方法获得的结果建立了三组不同的恶病质癌症患者:轻度恶病质(15≤×≤28)、中度恶病质(29≤×≤46)和重度恶病质(47≤×≤100)。此外,还提出了CASCO的简化版本,即MiniCASCO(MCASCO),它作为一种用于恶病质分期的有效且易于使用的工具发挥作用。在CASCO与其他经过验证的指标(如东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG))以及专业肿瘤学家对恶病质的主观诊断之间发现了显著的统计学相关性。发现CASCO与MCASCO之间存在非常显著的估计相关性,这表明MCASCO可能构成一种用于恶病质癌症患者分期的简便且有效的工具。CASCO和MCASCO为恶病质癌症患者的定量分期提供了一种新工具,相对于以往的分类具有明显优势。