Suppr超能文献

抑郁性反刍中的执行控制:改良混合性反眼跳任务中的反向抑制和非抑制性转换表现

Executive Control in Depressive Rumination: Backward Inhibition and Non-inhibitory Switching Performance in a Modified Mixed Antisaccade Task.

作者信息

Lo Barbara C Y, Liu Jeffrey C C

机构信息

Department of Psychology, The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

Department of Clinical Psychology, Tai Po Hospital Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 14;8:136. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00136. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The present study examines backward inhibition (BI) and non-inhibitory switching performance among depressed and healthy participants in a modified mixed antisaccade task. Specifically, sad and neutral faces were incorporated in the design to examine executive control difficulties associated with brooding trait.

METHODS

Thirty-nine participants took part in the study, including 19 depressed patients and 20 healthy control subjects. Participants completed a diagnostic interview and self-report questionnaires, including the Beck Depression Inventory and Ruminative Response Scale-Brooding Subscale. They were then instructed to complete prosaccade and antisaccade trials in the pure and mixed blocks whereby eye gazes were tracked to assess inhibition and switching efficiency.

RESULTS

For the switching effects, a significant group × brooding × task type interaction was found as hypothesized when multilevel modeling analysis was employed. Switching deficits associated with brooding was found to be greatest when sad faces were presented to depressed group. No significant results in BI or error rates were observed.

CONCLUSION

The patterns observed suggest that as opposed to BI, set shifting difficulty associated with brooding trait may be modulated by negative mood and cognition. In future research, emotional faces other than sad faces may be used to further explore if the observations could be generalized to other affective conditions.

摘要

背景与目的

本研究在一项改良的混合反扫视任务中,考察了抑郁参与者和健康参与者的反向抑制(BI)及非抑制性转换表现。具体而言,研究设计中纳入了悲伤和中性面孔,以检验与沉思特质相关的执行控制困难。

方法

39名参与者参与了本研究,其中包括19名抑郁症患者和20名健康对照者。参与者完成了诊断访谈和自我报告问卷,包括贝克抑郁量表和沉思反应量表-沉思子量表。然后,他们被要求在纯块和混合块中完成顺向扫视和反扫视试验,在此过程中跟踪眼睛注视以评估抑制和转换效率。

结果

对于转换效应,在采用多水平建模分析时,发现了如假设的显著的组×沉思×任务类型交互作用。当向抑郁组呈现悲伤面孔时,发现与沉思相关的转换缺陷最大。在反向抑制或错误率方面未观察到显著结果。

结论

观察到的模式表明,与反向抑制不同,与沉思特质相关的定势转换困难可能受负面情绪和认知的调节。在未来的研究中,可以使用除悲伤面孔之外的情绪面孔,以进一步探索这些观察结果是否可以推广到其他情感状况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4193/5306206/3d3123bda485/fpsyg-08-00136-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验