Suppr超能文献

两种不同的临床前猪到狒狒心脏异种移植模型中的血液动力学和围手术期管理。

Hemodynamic and perioperative management in two different preclinical pig-to-baboon cardiac xenotransplantation models.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.

Walter Brendel Centre of Experimental Medicine, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Xenotransplantation. 2017 May;24(3). doi: 10.1111/xen.12295. Epub 2017 Mar 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The perioperative phase of preclinical cardiac xenotransplantations significantly affects the experimental outcome. Moderate or even severe hemodynamic and respiratory impairment occurs frequently in baboons after receiving a cardiac transplant. The perioperative management of such postoperative instability is very demanding, especially in the experimental setting. We compared perioperative changes of hemodynamic and laboratory findings during orthotopic and heterotopic thoracic cardiac xenotransplantations and describe our monitoring, treatment and intensive care.

METHODS

Twenty-eight pig-to-baboon cardiac xenotransplantations were performed using either the orthotopic (oHTx, n=5) or heterotopic thoracic (htHTx; n=23) technique. In both techniques, cardioplegia and an intraoperative cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) were required. Preoperatively, intensive care (eg, transfusions, catecholamine therapy) was provided and fast extubation was targeted. A central venous catheter, a femoral arterial thermodilution catheter, a telemetric pressure transmitter and transthoracic echocardiography were used to monitor the animal. Baboon jackets with a tethering system were used to continuously apply medication postoperatively and permit blood sampling, also after extubation of the animal and transfer into the cage. Perioperative survival, hemodynamics, catecholamine doses, respiratory function and weaning from respirator were compared. Perioperative organ damage was evaluated based on laboratory findings 12 hours after transplantation.

RESULTS

Recipients could be weaned from CPB in the 20 htHTx and all five oHTx experiments, and three htHTx procedures were terminated during the operation. The time of cardiopulmonary bypass was significantly lower in the heterotopic group (oHTx median 171 [157-193] minutes; htHTx median 144 [100-190] minutes; P=.02). In 17 htHTx procedures, no inotropics were used, whereas epinephrine had to be administered in four of the five oHTx experiments; the mean time of catecholamine support was longer in the oHTx group (oHTx 972±348 minutes vs htHTx 111±92 minutes; P<.01). After htHTx, weaning off the respirator was possible in 19 of 20 cases (one died due to pneumothorax). After oHTx, three of the five baboons could be weaned off the respirator; in these cases, the arterial saturation was higher compared with the extubated baboons after htHTx (oHTx 99±1% vs htHTx 91±4%, P=.01). Intraoperative blood loss was similar between the two groups, and hemostasis was impaired after all procedures, but relevant postoperative bleeding never occurred.

CONCLUSION

Intensive intra- and postoperative monitoring and care is required in both transplantation techniques as a requirement for successful weaning from CPB and respirator. After htHTx, the animals needed less catecholamines and were hemodynamically more stable. Even though pulmonary function was often impaired after htHTx, weaning from the respirator and extubation was more successful in this group.

摘要

背景

心脏异种移植的围手术期阶段对实验结果有显著影响。在接受心脏移植后,狒狒经常出现中度甚至严重的血流动力学和呼吸功能障碍。这种术后不稳定的围手术期管理要求非常高,特别是在实验环境中。我们比较了同种异位和异源胸腔心脏异种移植围手术期的血流动力学和实验室检查结果,并描述了我们的监测、治疗和重症监护。

方法

使用同种异位(oHTx,n=5)或异源胸腔(htHTx;n=23)技术进行了 28 例猪到狒狒的心脏异种移植。两种技术都需要心脏停搏和术中心肺旁路(CPB)。术前提供重症监护(如输血、儿茶酚胺治疗),并以快速拔管为目标。使用中心静脉导管、股动脉热稀释导管、遥测压力传感器和经胸超声心动图监测动物。术后使用带系绳系统的狒狒夹克连续给药,并允许采血,即使在动物拔管并转移到笼子后也可以采血。比较围手术期存活率、血流动力学、儿茶酚胺剂量、呼吸功能和呼吸机脱机情况。根据移植后 12 小时的实验室检查结果评估围手术期器官损伤。

结果

20 例 htHTx 实验和 5 例 oHTx 实验中,受体可从 CPB 中脱机,3 例 htHTx 手术在手术过程中终止。异源组 CPB 时间明显缩短(oHTx 中位数 171[157-193]分钟;htHTx 中位数 144[100-190]分钟;P=.02)。在 17 例 htHTx 手术中未使用正性肌力药物,而在 5 例 oHTx 实验中有 4 例需要使用肾上腺素;oHTx 组儿茶酚胺支持时间较长(oHTx 972±348 分钟 vs htHTx 111±92 分钟;P<.01)。htHTx 后,20 例中有 19 例可脱机呼吸机(1 例因气胸死亡)。oHTx 后,5 例中有 3 例可脱机呼吸机;这些情况下,动脉饱和度较 htHTx 后脱机的狒狒更高(oHTx 99±1% vs htHTx 91±4%,P=.01)。两组术中出血量相似,术后止血均受损,但从未发生相关术后出血。

结论

两种移植技术均需要进行强化的围术期监测和护理,以成功脱机 CPB 和呼吸机。htHTx 后,动物需要的儿茶酚胺更少,血流动力学更稳定。尽管 htHTx 后常出现肺功能障碍,但该组脱机和拔管更成功。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验