Renard Eric
1 Department of Endocrinology, Montpellier University Hospital, Diabetes, Nutrition, Montpellier, France.
2 Clinical Investigation Centre, INSERM CIC 1411, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Mar;11(2):260-262. doi: 10.1177/1932296816675177. Epub 2016 Oct 23.
In an article in Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, Freckmann et al report an evaluation of 2 infusion sets used for CSII in daily life, both from Roche. Because the 2 catheters differed at the soft cannula level in terms of geometry and introducer needle, focus was made on pain at insertion. While no significant difference was noted on this primary endpoint, unplanned catheter changes occurred in close to 20% of cases also with both catheter models, mainly driven by apparent insulin delivery issues. Since kinked cannulas were not frequent, there is a clear need for better understanding of "unexplained hyperglycemia" as the main reason for reduction of catheter lifetime. Fixing this weak aspect of CSII becomes crucial while moving toward closed-loop insulin delivery.
在《糖尿病科学与技术杂志》上的一篇文章中,弗雷克曼等人报告了对罗氏公司生产的两种用于日常生活中持续皮下胰岛素输注(CSII)的输注装置的评估。由于这两种导管在软套管层面的几何形状和导入针方面存在差异,重点关注了插入时的疼痛情况。虽然在这个主要终点上没有观察到显著差异,但两种导管型号在近20%的病例中也出现了意外的导管更换情况,主要是由明显的胰岛素输送问题导致的。由于套管扭结并不常见,因此显然有必要更好地理解“不明原因的高血糖”作为导管使用寿命缩短的主要原因。在向闭环胰岛素输送发展的过程中,解决CSII的这一薄弱环节变得至关重要。