• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与初级保健健康促进的老年人的服务利用情况:一项潜在类别分析。

Service use of older people who participate in primary care health promotion: a latent class analysis.

作者信息

Ford John A, Kharicha Kalpa, Clarke Caroline S, Clark Allan, Iliffe Steve, Goodman Claire, Manthorpe Jill, Steel Nick, Walters Kate

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.

Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, Royal Free Campus Rowland Hill St, London, NW3 2PF, UK.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Mar 6;17(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2122-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-017-2122-6
PMID:28264676
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5339972/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recruiting patients to health promotion programmes who will benefit is crucial to success. A key policy driver for health promotion in older people is to reduce health and social care use. Our aim was to describe service use among older people taking part in the Multi-dimensional Risk Appraisal for Older people primary care health promotion programme.

METHODS

A random sample of 1 in 3 older people (≥65 years old) was invited to participate in the Multi-dimensional Risk Appraisal for Older people project across five general practices in London and Hertfordshire. Data collected included socio-demographic characteristics, well-being and functional ability, lifestyle factors and service use. Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to identify groups based on use of the following: secondary health care, primary health care, community health care, paid care, unpaid care, leisure and local authority resources. Differences in group characteristics were assessed using univariate logistic regression, weighted by probability of class assignation and clustered by GP practice.

RESULTS

Response rate was 34% (526/1550) with 447 participants presenting sufficient data for analysis. LCA using three groups gave the most meaningful interpretation and best model fit. About a third (active well) were fit and active with low service use. Just under a third (high NHS users) had high impairments with high primary, secondary and community health care contact, but low non-health services use. Just over a third (community service users) with high impairments used community health and other services without much hospital use.

CONCLUSION

Older people taking part in the Multi-dimensional Risk Appraisal for Older people primary care health promotion can be described as three groups: active well, high NHS users, and community service users.

摘要

背景

招募能从中受益的患者参与健康促进项目是项目成功的关键。促进老年人健康的一项关键政策驱动因素是减少医疗和社会护理的使用。我们的目的是描述参与老年人初级保健健康促进多维风险评估项目的老年人的服务使用情况。

方法

从三分之一的老年人(≥65岁)中随机抽取样本,邀请他们参与伦敦和赫特福德郡五个全科诊所的老年人多维风险评估项目。收集的数据包括社会人口学特征、幸福感和功能能力、生活方式因素以及服务使用情况。潜在类别分析(LCA)用于根据以下服务的使用情况识别不同群体:二级医疗保健、初级医疗保健、社区医疗保健、付费护理、无偿护理、休闲和地方当局资源。使用单因素逻辑回归评估群体特征的差异,按类别分配概率加权,并按全科医生诊所聚类。

结果

回复率为34%(526/1550),447名参与者提供了足够的分析数据。使用三组的潜在类别分析给出了最有意义的解释和最佳的模型拟合。约三分之一(健康活跃组)健康且活跃,服务使用量低。略低于三分之一(国民保健服务高使用组)有高度损伤,初级、二级和社区医疗保健接触率高,但非医疗服务使用量低。略多于三分之一(社区服务使用组)有高度损伤,使用社区医疗和其他服务,但很少住院。

结论

参与老年人初级保健健康促进多维风险评估的老年人可分为三组:健康活跃组、国民保健服务高使用组和社区服务使用组。

相似文献

1
Service use of older people who participate in primary care health promotion: a latent class analysis.参与初级保健健康促进的老年人的服务利用情况:一项潜在类别分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Mar 6;17(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2122-6.
2
Promotion of health in older people: a randomised controlled trial of health risk appraisal in British general practice.老年人健康促进:英国全科医疗中健康风险评估的一项随机对照试验。
Age Ageing. 2008 Sep;37(5):565-71. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afn150.
3
Multicentre cluster randomised trial comparing a community group exercise programme and home-based exercise with usual care for people aged 65 years and over in primary care.一项多中心整群随机试验,比较社区团体锻炼计划、居家锻炼与常规护理对基层医疗中65岁及以上老年人的效果。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Aug;18(49):vii-xxvii, 1-105. doi: 10.3310/hta18490.
4
Promoting independence, health and well-being for older people: a feasibility study of computer-aided health and social risk appraisal system in primary care.促进老年人的独立性、健康和福祉:基层医疗中计算机辅助健康与社会风险评估系统的可行性研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Mar 24;18(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0620-6.
5
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of a home-based health promotion intervention for older people with mild frailty in England: a multicentre, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial.英国针对轻度虚弱老年人的居家健康促进干预措施的临床效果及成本效益:一项多中心、平行组、随机对照试验
Lancet Healthy Longev. 2025 Feb;6(2):100670. doi: 10.1016/j.lanhl.2024.100670. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
6
Youth violence intervention programme for vulnerable young people attending emergency departments in London: a rapid evaluation.伦敦急诊部脆弱青年暴力干预方案:快速评估。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jul;11(10):1-122. doi: 10.3310/JWKT0492.
7
The feasibility and acceptability of a specialist health and social care team for the promotion of health and independence in 'at risk' older adults.一个专业健康与社会护理团队在促进“高危”老年人健康和独立方面的可行性与可接受性。
Health Soc Care Community. 2005 Mar;13(2):136-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2005.00541.x.
8
Health risk appraisal in older people 1: are older people living alone an "at-risk" group?老年人健康风险评估1:独居老年人是“高危”群体吗?
Br J Gen Pract. 2007 Apr;57(537):271-6.
9
Enabling health and maintaining independence for older people at home (HomeHealth trial): a multicentre randomised controlled trial.使老年人能够在家中保持健康和独立(HomeHealth 试验):一项多中心随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2023 Nov;402 Suppl 1:S42. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02071-8.
10
Fall prevention interventions in primary care to reduce fractures and falls in people aged 70 years and over: the PreFIT three-arm cluster RCT.初级保健中的防跌倒干预措施以减少 70 岁及以上人群的骨折和跌倒:PreFIT 三臂群组 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 May;25(34):1-114. doi: 10.3310/hta25340.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding social care need through primary care big data: a rapid scoping review.通过初级保健大数据了解社会护理需求:一项快速综述。
BJGP Open. 2022 Dec 20;6(4). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0016. Print 2022 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of health risk assessment and counselling on health behaviour and survival in older people: a pragmatic randomised trial.健康风险评估与咨询对老年人健康行为及生存的影响:一项实用随机试验
PLoS Med. 2015 Oct 19;12(10):e1001889. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001889. eCollection 2015 Oct.
2
Eliminating Bias in Classify-Analyze Approaches for Latent Class Analysis.消除潜在类别分析中分类-分析方法的偏差。
Struct Equ Modeling. 2015 Jan;22(1):1-11. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2014.935265.
3
Multicentre cluster randomised trial comparing a community group exercise programme and home-based exercise with usual care for people aged 65 years and over in primary care.一项多中心整群随机试验,比较社区团体锻炼计划、居家锻炼与常规护理对基层医疗中65岁及以上老年人的效果。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Aug;18(49):vii-xxvii, 1-105. doi: 10.3310/hta18490.
4
Using the past to predict the future: latent class analysis of patterns of health service use of older adults in the emergency department.利用过去预测未来:老年患者在急诊科就诊的卫生服务使用模式的潜在类别分析。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 Apr;62(4):711-5. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12746. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
5
User involvement in the development of a health promotion technology for older people: findings from the SWISH project.用户参与老年人健康促进技术的开发:SWISH 项目的研究结果。
Health Soc Care Community. 2010 Mar;18(2):147-59. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2009.00882.x. Epub 2009 Aug 25.
6
Complex interventions to improve physical function and maintain independent living in elderly people: a systematic review and meta-analysis.改善老年人身体功能和维持独立生活的复杂干预措施:系统评价与荟萃分析
Lancet. 2008 Mar 1;371(9614):725-35. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60342-6.
7
Home as a signification of independence and autonomy: experiences among very old Swedish people.家作为独立和自主的象征:瑞典高龄老人的经历
Scand J Occup Ther. 2007;14(1):16-24. doi: 10.1080/11038120601024929.
8
The PRO-AGE study: an international randomised controlled study of health risk appraisal for older persons based in general practice.PRO-AGE研究:一项基于全科医疗的老年人健康风险评估国际随机对照研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007 Jan 11;7:2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-7-2.
9
Evidence review on older people's views and experiences of falls prevention strategies.关于老年人对跌倒预防策略的看法和经历的证据综述
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2004;1(1):20-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2004.04013.x.
10
Health risk appraisal for older people in general practice using an expert system: a pilot study.使用专家系统对全科医疗中的老年人进行健康风险评估:一项试点研究。
Health Soc Care Community. 2005 Jan;13(1):21-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2005.00525.x.