Suppr超能文献

混合特征:概念的演变、过去和当前的定义以及未来前景。

Mixed features: evolution of the concept, past and current definitions, and future prospects.

作者信息

Swann Alan C

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences,Baylor College of Medicine,Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center,Houston,Texas,USA.

出版信息

CNS Spectr. 2017 Apr;22(2):161-169. doi: 10.1017/S1092852916000882. Epub 2017 Mar 7.

Abstract

Mixed states address the relationships between episodes and the course of an illness, presenting significant clinical challenges. Recurrent affective disorders were described thousands of years ago as dimensional disturbances of the basic elements of behavior, combining the characteristics of what we would now consider manic and depressive episodes. It was recognized from the beginning that combinations of depressive and manic features are associated with a severe illness course, including increased suicide risk. Early descriptions of affective disorders formulated them as systemic illnesses, a concept supported by more recent data. Descriptions of affective disorders and their course, including mixed states, became more systematic during the 19th century. Structured criteria achieved importance with evidence that, in addition to early onset, frequent recurrence, and comorbid problems, mixed states had worse treatment outcomes than other episodes. In contrast to 2000 years of literature on recurrent affective episodes and mixed states, the unipolar-bipolar disorder distinction was formalized in the mid-20th century. Mixed-state criteria, initially developed for bipolar disorder, ranged from fully combined depression and mania to the DSM-5 criteria, no longer limited to bipolar disorder, of a primary depressive or manic episode with at least three symptoms of the other episode type. The challenges involved in understanding and identifying mixed states center largely on what drives them, including (1) their formulation as either categorical or dimensional constructs, (2) the specificity of their relationships to depressive or manic episodes, and (3) specificity for bipolar versus major depressive disorder. Their existence challenges the distinction between bipolar and major depressive disorders. The challenges involved in identifying the underlying physiological mechanisms go to the heart of these questions.

摘要

混合状态涉及发作与疾病病程之间的关系,带来了重大的临床挑战。复发性情感障碍在数千年前就被描述为行为基本要素的维度紊乱,兼具我们现在所认为的躁狂和抑郁发作的特征。从一开始就认识到,抑郁和躁狂特征的组合与严重的疾病病程相关,包括自杀风险增加。情感障碍的早期描述将其表述为全身性疾病,这一概念得到了近期数据的支持。在19世纪,对情感障碍及其病程(包括混合状态)的描述变得更加系统。随着证据表明,除了早发、频繁复发和共病问题外,混合状态的治疗结果比其他发作更差,结构化标准变得重要起来。与关于复发性情感发作和混合状态的2000年文献形成对比的是,单相双相情感障碍的区分在20世纪中叶正式确立。混合状态标准最初是为双相情感障碍制定的,范围从完全合并的抑郁和躁狂到《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版的标准,该标准不再局限于双相情感障碍,而是指一次主要的抑郁或躁狂发作,同时伴有至少三种另一种发作类型的症状。理解和识别混合状态所涉及的挑战主要集中在驱动它们的因素上,包括(1)将它们表述为分类或维度结构,(2)它们与抑郁或躁狂发作关系的特异性,以及(3)双相情感障碍与重度抑郁症的特异性。它们的存在对双相情感障碍和重度抑郁症之间的区分提出了挑战。识别潜在生理机制所涉及的挑战是这些问题的核心。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验