Suppr超能文献

鼓励使用楼梯的激励标识已成为过去式了吗?一项多建筑研究。

Are motivational signs to increase stair use a thing of the past? A multi-building study.

作者信息

Engelen Lina, Gale Joanne, Chau Josephine Y, Bauman Adrian

机构信息

Prevention Research Collaboration, School of Public Health, Level 6, The Hub, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.

出版信息

Health Promot J Austr. 2017 Dec;28(3):178-184. doi: 10.1071/HE16107.

Abstract

Issue addressed Only half of Australia's adult population is sufficiently physical active. One method thought to increase incidental physical activity at work is the use of stair-promoting interventions. Stairs are readily available and stair climbing is considered vigorous physical activity. Motivational signs have been extensively and effectively trialled to increase stair use, but are they suitable for contemporary populations? Methods Participants were occupants of three selected University of Sydney buildings using the elevators or stairs. Infrared people counters were installed to monitor stair and elevator use for 24 h/day during two baseline weeks, followed by two intervention weeks, where motivational and directional signs were placed at points of choice. Results At baseline there was a large between-building variation in the change in stair to elevator proportion, where we observed a small increase in two buildings (81-84%, odds ratio (OR): 1.16 (1.09, 1.23), and 26-27%, OR: 1.09 (1.03, 1.15)), and a decrease (30-25%, OR: 0.75 (0.72, 0.77) in the third building. Conclusions Differences in stair use among buildings could be due to building design and function. Motivational and directional signs to promote stair use showed small or nil effects. The future of interventions promoting stair use in occupational settings may need more interactive or personalised intervention methods. So what? The implications of this study are that posters to promote stair use might be a thing of the past and this should be considered in future workplace health promotion efforts to increase physical activity. More novel and interactive methods using new media are recommended.

摘要

研究问题

澳大利亚只有一半的成年人口有足够的身体活动。一种被认为可以增加工作中偶然身体活动的方法是采用促进走楼梯的干预措施。楼梯随处可见,爬楼梯被认为是剧烈的身体活动。激励性标识已被广泛且有效地试验以增加楼梯的使用,但它们是否适合当代人群呢?

方法

参与者是悉尼大学三座选定建筑中使用电梯或楼梯的人员。安装了红外人数计数器,在两个基线周期间每天24小时监测楼梯和电梯的使用情况,随后是两个干预周,在选择点放置激励性和导向性标识。

结果

在基线时,各建筑之间楼梯与电梯使用比例的变化存在很大差异,我们观察到两座建筑中有小幅增加(分别为81 - 84%,优势比(OR):1.16(1.09,1.23),以及26 - 27%,OR:1.09(1.03,1.15)),而第三座建筑中则出现下降(从30%降至25%,OR:0.75(0.72,0.77))。

结论

建筑之间楼梯使用情况的差异可能归因于建筑设计和功能。促进楼梯使用的激励性和导向性标识显示出的效果很小或没有效果。在职业环境中促进楼梯使用的干预措施未来可能需要更具互动性或个性化的干预方法。

那又如何?

这项研究的意义在于,促进楼梯使用的海报可能已成为过去式,在未来促进工作场所健康以增加身体活动的努力中应考虑到这一点。建议采用更多使用新媒体的新颖且互动性强的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验