Woodhouse Lisa J, Manning Lisa, Potter John F, Berge Eivind, Sprigg Nikola, Wardlaw Joanna, Lees Kennedy R, Bath Philip M, Robinson Thompson G
From the Stroke Trials Unit, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom (L.J.W., N.S., P.M.B.); University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, United Kingdom (L.M.); Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norfolk, United Kingdom (J.F.P.); Department of Internal Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Norway (E.B.); Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom (J.W.); Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom (K.R.L.); and Department of Cardiovascular Sciences and NIHR Biomedical Research Unit in Cardiovascular Disease, University of Leicester, United Kingdom (T.G.R.).
Hypertension. 2017 May;69(5):933-941. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.07982. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
Over 50% of patients are already taking blood pressure-lowering therapy on hospital admission for acute stroke. An individual patient data meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials was undertaken to determine the effect of continuation versus temporarily stopping preexisting antihypertensive medication in acute stroke. Key databases were searched for trials against the following inclusion criteria: randomized design; stroke onset ≤48 hours; investigating the effect of continuation versus stopping prestroke antihypertensive medication; and follow-up of ≥2 weeks. Two randomized controlled trials were identified and included in this meta-analysis of individual patient data from 2860 patients with ≤48 hours of acute stroke. Risk of bias in each study was low. In adjusted logistic regression and multiple regression analyses (using random effects), we found no significant association between continuation of prestroke antihypertensive therapy (versus stopping) and risk of death or dependency at final follow-up: odds ratio 0.96 (95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.14). No significant associations were found between continuation (versus stopping) of therapy and secondary outcomes at final follow-up. Analyses for death and dependency in prespecified subgroups revealed no significant associations with continuation versus temporarily stopping therapy, with the exception of patients randomized ≤12 hours, in whom a difference favoring stopping treatment met statistical significance. We found no significant benefit with continuation of antihypertensive treatment in the acute stroke period. Therefore, there is no urgency to administer preexisting antihypertensive therapy in the first few hours or days after stroke, unless indicated for other comorbid conditions.
超过50%的患者在因急性卒中入院时已在接受降压治疗。我们进行了一项基于随机对照试验的个体患者数据荟萃分析,以确定在急性卒中中继续使用与暂时停用既往抗高血压药物的效果。检索了主要数据库,查找符合以下纳入标准的试验:随机设计;卒中发病时间≤48小时;研究继续使用与停用卒中前抗高血压药物的效果;以及随访时间≥2周。我们确定了两项随机对照试验,并将其纳入这项对2860例急性卒中发病时间≤48小时的患者的个体患者数据荟萃分析中。每项研究的偏倚风险较低。在调整后的逻辑回归和多元回归分析(采用随机效应)中,我们发现在最终随访时,卒中前抗高血压治疗的继续使用(与停用相比)与死亡或依赖风险之间无显著关联:比值比为0.96(95%置信区间为0.80 - 1.14)。在最终随访时,未发现治疗的继续使用(与停用相比)与次要结局之间存在显著关联。对预先设定亚组中的死亡和依赖情况进行的分析显示,继续使用与暂时停用治疗相比无显著关联,但随机分组时间≤12小时的患者除外,在这些患者中,倾向于停用治疗的差异具有统计学意义。我们发现在急性卒中期间继续进行抗高血压治疗无显著益处。因此,在卒中后的最初数小时或数天内,除非有其他合并症需要,否则无需急于给予既往的抗高血压治疗。