Gnjidic Danijela, Langford Aili V, Jordan Vanessa, Sawan Mouna, Sheppard James P, Thompson Wade, Todd Adam, Hopper Ingrid, Hilmer Sarah N, Reeve Emily
Sydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 31;3(3):CD012572. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012572.pub3.
Hypertension is an important risk factor for subsequent cardiovascular events, including ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke, myocardial infarction, and heart failure, as well as chronic kidney disease, cognitive decline, and premature death. Overall, the use of antihypertensive medications has led to a reduction in cardiovascular disease, morbidity rates, and mortality rates. However, the use of antihypertensive medications is also associated with harms, especially in older people, including the development of adverse drug reactions and drug-drug interactions, and can contribute to increasing medication-related burden. As such, discontinuation of antihypertensives may be considered appropriate in some older people.
To evaluate the effects of withdrawal of antihypertensive medications used for hypertension or primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in older adults.
For this update, we searched the Cochrane Hypertension Specialised Register, CENTRAL (2022, Issue 9), Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, the WHO ICTRP, and ClinicalTrials.gov up to October 2022. We also conducted reference checking and citation searches, and contacted study authors to identify any additional studies when appropriate. There were no language restrictions on the searches.
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of withdrawal versus continuation of antihypertensive medications used for hypertension or primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in older adults (defined as 50 years of age and over). Eligible participants were living in the community, residential aged care facilities, or based in hospital settings. We included trials evaluating the complete withdrawal of all antihypertensive medication, as well as those focusing on a dose reduction of antihypertensive medication.
We compared the intervention of discontinuing or reducing the dose of antihypertensive medication to continuing antihypertensive medication using mean differences (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for continuous variables, and Peto odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CI for binary variables. Our primary outcomes were mortality, myocardial infarction, and the development of adverse drug reactions or adverse drug withdrawal reactions. Secondary outcomes included hospitalisation, stroke, blood pressure (systolic and diastolic), falls, quality of life, and success in withdrawing from antihypertensives. Two review authors independently, and in duplicate, conducted all stages of study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment.
We identified no new studies in this update. Six RCTs from the original review met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review (1073 participants). Study duration and follow-up ranged from 4 weeks to 56 weeks. Meta-analysis of studies showed that discontinuing antihypertensives, compared to continuing, may result in little to no difference in all-cause mortality (OR 2.08, 95% CI 0.79 to 5.46; P = 0.14, I = 0%; 4 studies, 630 participants; low certainty of evidence), and that the evidence is very uncertain about the effect on myocardial infarction (OR 1.86, 95% CI 0.19 to 17.98; P = 0.59, I = 0%; 2 studies, 447 participants; very low certainty of evidence). Meta-analysis was not possible for the development of adverse drug reactions and withdrawal reactions; the evidence is very uncertain about the effect of antihypertensive discontinuation on the risk of adverse drug reactions (very low certainty of evidence), and the included studies did not assess adverse drug withdrawal reactions specifically. One study reported on hospitalisations; discontinuing antihypertensives may result in little to no difference in hospitalisation (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.33 to 2.10; P = 0.70; 1 study, 385 participants; low certainty of evidence). Meta-analysis showed that discontinuing antihypertensives may result in little to no difference in stroke (OR 1.44, 95% CI 0.25 to 8.35; P = 0.68, I = 6%; 3 studies, 524 participants; low certainty of evidence). Blood pressure may be higher in the discontinuation group than the continuation group (systolic blood pressure: MD 9.75 mmHg, 95% CI 7.33 to 12.18; P < 0.001, I = 67%; 5 studies, 767 participants; low certainty of evidence; and diastolic blood pressure: MD 3.5 mmHg, 95% CI 1.82 to 5.18; P < 0.001, I = 47%; 5 studies, 768 participants; low certainty of evidence). No studies reported falls. The sources of bias included selective reporting (reporting bias), lack of blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias), incomplete outcome data (attrition bias), and lack of blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The main conclusions from the 2020 review still apply. Discontinuing antihypertensives may result in little to no difference in mortality, hospitalisation, and stroke. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of discontinuing antihypertensives on myocardial infarction and adverse drug reactions and adverse drug withdrawal reactions. Discontinuing antihypertensives may result in an increase in blood pressure. There was no information about the effect on falls. The evidence was of low to very low certainty, mainly due to small studies and low event rates. These limitations mean that we cannot draw any firm conclusions about the effect of deprescribing antihypertensives on these outcomes. Future research should focus on populations with the greatest uncertainty of the benefit:risk ratio for the use of antihypertensive medications, such as those with frailty, older age groups, and those taking polypharmacy, and measure clinically important outcomes such as adverse drug events, falls, and quality of life.
高血压是后续心血管事件的重要危险因素,包括缺血性和出血性中风、心肌梗死、心力衰竭,以及慢性肾病、认知功能下降和过早死亡。总体而言,使用抗高血压药物已导致心血管疾病、发病率和死亡率降低。然而,使用抗高血压药物也存在危害,尤其是在老年人中,包括发生药物不良反应和药物相互作用,并且可能导致药物相关负担增加。因此,在某些老年人中停用抗高血压药物可能被认为是合适的。
评估停用用于高血压或心血管疾病一级预防的抗高血压药物对老年人的影响。
本次更新中,我们检索了Cochrane高血压专业注册库、CENTRAL(2022年第9期)、Ovid MEDLINE、Ovid Embase、世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台(WHO ICTRP)以及ClinicalTrials.gov,检索截至2022年10月。我们还进行了参考文献核对和引文检索,并在适当时联系研究作者以识别任何其他研究。检索没有语言限制。
我们纳入了关于老年人(定义为50岁及以上)停用与继续使用用于高血压或心血管疾病一级预防的抗高血压药物的随机对照试验(RCT)。符合条件的参与者居住在社区、老年护理机构或医院环境中。我们纳入了评估完全停用所有抗高血压药物的试验,以及那些侧重于降低抗高血压药物剂量的试验。
我们使用连续变量的平均差(MD)和95%置信区间(95%CI),以及二元变量的Peto比值比(OR)和95%CI,将停用或降低抗高血压药物剂量的干预措施与继续使用抗高血压药物进行比较。我们的主要结局是死亡率、心肌梗死以及药物不良反应或药物撤药反应的发生。次要结局包括住院、中风、血压(收缩压和舒张压)、跌倒、生活质量以及停用抗高血压药物的成功率。两位综述作者独立且重复地进行研究选择、数据提取和质量评估的所有阶段。
本次更新中我们未识别到新的研究。原始综述中的六项RCT符合纳入标准并被纳入本综述(1073名参与者)。研究持续时间和随访时间从4周至56周不等。研究的Meta分析表明,与继续使用抗高血压药物相比,停用抗高血压药物可能导致全因死亡率几乎没有差异(OR 2.08,95%CI 0.79至5.46;P = 0.14,I² = 0%;4项研究,630名参与者;证据确定性低),并且关于对心肌梗死的影响证据非常不确定(OR 1.86,95%CI 0.19至17.98;P = 0.59,I² = 0%;2项研究,447名参与者;证据确定性极低)。对于药物不良反应和撤药反应的发生无法进行Meta分析;关于停用抗高血压药物对药物不良反应风险的影响证据非常不确定(证据确定性极低),并且纳入的研究未专门评估药物撤药反应。一项研究报告了住院情况;停用抗高血压药物可能导致住院几乎没有差异(OR 0.83,95%CI 0.33至2.10;P = 0.70;1项研究,385名参与者;证据确定性低)。Meta分析表明,停用抗高血压药物可能导致中风几乎没有差异(OR 1.44,95%CI 0.25至8.35;P = 0.68,I² = 6%;3项研究,524名参与者;证据确定性低)。停用组的血压可能高于继续使用组(收缩压:MD 9.75 mmHg,95%CI 7.33至12.18;P < 未识别到新的研究。原始综述中的六项RCT符合纳入标准并被纳入本综述(1073名参与者)。研究持续时间和随访时间从4周至56周不等。研究的Meta分析表明,与继续使用抗高血压药物相比,停用抗高血压药物可能导致全因死亡率几乎没有差异(OR 2.08,95%CI 0.79至5.46;P = 0.14,I² = 0%;4项研究,630名参与者;证据确定性低),并且关于对心肌梗死的影响证据非常不确定(OR 1.86,95%CI 0.19至17.98;P = 0.59,I² = 0%;2项研究,447名参与者;证据确定性极低)。对于药物不良反应和撤药反应的发生无法进行Meta分析;关于停用抗高血压药物对药物不良反应风险影响的证据非常不确定(证据确定性极低),并且纳入的研究未专门评估药物撤药反应。一项研究报告了住院情况;停用抗高血压药物可能导致住院几乎没有差异(OR 0.83,95%CI 0.33至2.10;P = 0.70;1项研究,385名参与者;证据确定性低)。Meta分析表明,停用抗高血压药物可能导致中风几乎没有差异(OR 1.44,95%CI 0.25至8.35;P = 0.68,I² = 6%;3项研究,524名参与者;证据确定性低)。停用组血压可能高于继续使用组(收缩压:MD 9.75 mmHg,95%CI 7.33至12.18;P < 0.001,I² = 67%;5项研究,767名参与者;证据确定性低;舒张压:MD 3.5 mmHg,95%CI 1.82至5.18;P < 0.001,I² = 47%;5项研究,768名参与者;证据确定性低)。没有研究报告跌倒情况。偏倚来源包括选择性报告(报告偏倚)、结局评估缺乏盲法(检测偏倚)、结局数据不完整(失访偏倚)以及参与者和研究人员缺乏盲法(实施偏倚)。
2020年综述的主要结论仍然适用。停用抗高血压药物可能导致死亡率、住院率和中风几乎没有差异。关于停用抗高血压药物对心肌梗死以及药物不良反应和药物撤药反应的影响,证据非常不确定。停用抗高血压药物可能导致血压升高。没有关于对跌倒影响的信息。证据的确定性为低至极低,主要是由于研究规模小和事件发生率低。这些局限性意味着我们无法就停用抗高血压药物对这些结局的影响得出任何确凿结论。未来的研究应关注使用抗高血压药物的获益风险比不确定性最大的人群,如体弱人群、老年人群以及服用多种药物的人群,并测量药物不良事件、跌倒和生活质量等临床重要结局。