Furniss Stephanie K, Burton Matthew M, Grando Adela, Larson David W, Kaufman David R
Department of Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, Scottsdale, AZ.
Department of Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, Scottsdale, AZ; Office of Information and Knowledge Management.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2017 Feb 10;2016:580-589. eCollection 2016.
There are numerous methods to study workflow. However, few produce the kinds of in-depth analyses needed to understand EHR-mediated workflow. Here we investigated variations in clinicians' EHR workflow by integrating quantitative analysis of patterns of users' EHR-interactions with in-depth qualitative analysis of user performance. We characterized 6 clinicians' patterns of information-gathering using a sequential process-mining approach. The analysis revealed 519 different screen transition patterns performed across 1569 patient cases. No one pattern was followed for more than 10% of patient cases, the 15 most frequent patterns accounted for over half ofpatient cases (53%), and 27% of cases exhibited unique patterns. By triangulating quantitative and qualitative analyses, we found that participants' EHR-interactive behavior was associated with their routine processes, patient case complexity, and EHR default settings. The proposed approach has significant potential to inform resource allocation for observation and training. In-depth observations helped us to explain variation across users.
研究工作流程有多种方法。然而,很少有方法能进行深入分析以理解电子健康记录(EHR)介导的工作流程。在此,我们通过将用户EHR交互模式的定量分析与用户表现的深入定性分析相结合,研究了临床医生EHR工作流程的差异。我们使用顺序过程挖掘方法对6名临床医生的信息收集模式进行了特征描述。分析揭示了在1569例患者病例中出现的519种不同的屏幕转换模式。没有一种模式在超过10%的患者病例中被遵循,15种最常见的模式占患者病例的一半以上(53%),27%的病例呈现出独特模式。通过对定量和定性分析进行三角互证,我们发现参与者的EHR交互行为与其常规流程、患者病例复杂性以及EHR默认设置相关。所提出的方法在为观察和培训的资源分配提供信息方面具有巨大潜力。深入观察有助于我们解释用户之间的差异。