• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

你总是选择自己喜欢的东西吗?微妙的社会暗示会增加日本人的偏好与选择的一致性,但美国人却不会。

Do You Always Choose What You Like? Subtle Social Cues Increase Preference-Choice Consistency among Japanese But Not among Americans.

作者信息

Uchida Yukiko, Savani Krishna, Hitokoto Hidefumi, Kaino Koichi

机构信息

Kokoro Research Center, Kyoto University Kyoto, Japan.

Division of Strategy, Management, and Organization, Nanyang Business School Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 21;8:169. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00169. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00169
PMID:28270779
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5319393/
Abstract

Previous research has suggested that stability of self-concept differs across cultures: in North American cultural contexts, people's self-concept is stable across social contexts, whereas in Japan, different self-concepts are activated within specific social contexts. We examined the implications of this cultural difference for preference-choice consistency, which is people's tendency to make choices that are consistent with their preferences. We found that Japanese were less likely than Americans to choose items that they liked the most, showing preference-choice inconsistency. We also investigated the conditions in which Japanese might exhibit greater preference-choice consistency. Consistent with research showing that in Japanese culture, the self is primarily conceptualized and activated by social contexts, we found that subtle social cues (e.g., schematic representations of human faces) increased preference-choice consistency among Japanese, but not among Americans. These findings highlight that choices do not reveal preferences to the same extent in all cultures, and that the extent to which choices reveal preferences depends on the social context.

摘要

以往的研究表明,自我概念的稳定性在不同文化中存在差异:在北美文化背景下,人们的自我概念在不同社会情境中保持稳定,而在日本,特定社会情境会激活不同的自我概念。我们研究了这种文化差异对偏好选择一致性的影响,偏好选择一致性是指人们做出与其偏好相符选择的倾向。我们发现,日本人比美国人更不可能选择他们最喜欢的物品,表现出偏好选择不一致。我们还研究了日本人可能表现出更高偏好选择一致性的条件。与表明在日本文化中,自我主要由社会情境概念化并激活的研究一致,我们发现微妙的社会线索(例如人脸的示意性表征)增加了日本人的偏好选择一致性,但对美国人没有影响。这些发现凸显出,在所有文化中,选择揭示偏好的程度不尽相同,而且选择揭示偏好的程度取决于社会情境。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/312f/5319393/94d80982d022/fpsyg-08-00169-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/312f/5319393/dfee324b2c3f/fpsyg-08-00169-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/312f/5319393/03152d236e28/fpsyg-08-00169-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/312f/5319393/94d80982d022/fpsyg-08-00169-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/312f/5319393/dfee324b2c3f/fpsyg-08-00169-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/312f/5319393/03152d236e28/fpsyg-08-00169-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/312f/5319393/94d80982d022/fpsyg-08-00169-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Do You Always Choose What You Like? Subtle Social Cues Increase Preference-Choice Consistency among Japanese But Not among Americans.你总是选择自己喜欢的东西吗?微妙的社会暗示会增加日本人的偏好与选择的一致性,但美国人却不会。
Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 21;8:169. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00169. eCollection 2017.
2
Let your preference be your guide? Preferences and choices are more tightly linked for North Americans than for Indians.以你的偏好为指引?相比于印度人,北美人的偏好与选择之间的联系更为紧密。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Oct;95(4):861-76. doi: 10.1037/a0011618.
3
Is there any "free" choice? Self and dissonance in two cultures.是否存在“自由”选择?两种文化中的自我与失调。
Psychol Sci. 2004 Aug;15(8):527-33. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00714.x.
4
Culture and self-concept stability: consistency across and within contexts among Asian Americans and European Americans.文化与自我概念稳定性:亚裔美国人和欧裔美国人在不同情境及同一情境中的一致性。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Sep;93(3):478-90. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.478.
5
Self-concept consistency and culture: the differential impact of two forms of consistency.自我概念一致性与文化:两种一致性形式的差异影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2011 Jun;37(6):838-49. doi: 10.1177/0146167211400621. Epub 2011 Mar 11.
6
Social-Class Differences in Consumer Choices: Working-Class Individuals Are More Sensitive to Choices of Others Than Middle-Class Individuals.消费者选择中的社会阶层差异:工人阶级个体比中产阶级个体对他人的选择更敏感。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2016 Apr;42(4):430-43. doi: 10.1177/0146167216634043.
7
A comparative study of color preferences in Japan, China and Indonesia, with emphasis on the preference for white.日本、中国和印度尼西亚颜色偏好的比较研究,重点是对白色的偏好。
Percept Mot Skills. 1996 Aug;83(1):115-28. doi: 10.2466/pms.1996.83.1.115.
8
What you see is what you get: webcam placement influences perception and social coordination.所见即所得:网络摄像头的放置会影响感知和社交协调。
Front Psychol. 2015 Mar 19;6:306. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00306. eCollection 2015.
9
Express your social self: cultural differences in choice of brand-name versus generic products.表达你的社交自我:品牌名称与通用产品选择中的文化差异。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009 Dec;35(12):1555-66. doi: 10.1177/0146167209348641. Epub 2009 Oct 9.
10
Affiliative preferences are stable and predict mate choices in both sexes of Japanese quail, Coturnix japonica.亲和偏好是稳定的,并能预测日本鹌鹑(Coturnix japonica)两性的配偶选择。
Anim Behav. 1999 Oct;58(4):865-871. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1210.

引用本文的文献

1
Does Long-Term Training in a Water Immersion Environment Change Interoception?长期在浸水环境中训练会改变内脏感知吗?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 29;18(19):10259. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910259.

本文引用的文献

1
Interdependent selves show face-induced facilitation of error processing: cultural neuroscience of self-threat.相互依存的自我表现出面子引发的错误处理促进作用:自我威胁的文化神经科学。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Feb;9(2):201-8. doi: 10.1093/scan/nss125. Epub 2012 Nov 18.
2
Deference in Indians' decision making: introjected goals or injunctive norms?印度人决策中的顺从:内摄目标还是约束性规范?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Apr;102(4):685-99. doi: 10.1037/a0026415. Epub 2011 Dec 12.
3
Differences between tight and loose cultures: a 33-nation study.
紧密文化和松散文化的差异:一项 33 国研究。
Science. 2011 May 27;332(6033):1100-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1197754.
4
How choice modifies preference: neural correlates of choice justification.选择如何改变偏好:选择辩护的神经关联。
Neuroimage. 2011 Mar 1;55(1):240-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.076. Epub 2010 Dec 3.
5
What counts as a choice? U.S. Americans are more likely than Indians to construe actions as choices.什么算是一种选择?与印度人相比,美国人更倾向于将行为解释为选择。
Psychol Sci. 2010 Mar;21(3):391-8. doi: 10.1177/0956797609359908. Epub 2010 Jan 14.
6
Interdependence modulates the brain response to word-voice incongruity.相互依赖调节了大脑对词-语音不一致的反应。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2010 Jun;5(2-3):307-17. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsp044. Epub 2009 Dec 2.
7
Emotions as within or between people? Cultural variation in lay theories of emotion expression and inference.情绪是内在的还是人与人之间的?情绪表达和推断的朴素理论中的文化差异。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009 Nov;35(11):1427-39. doi: 10.1177/0146167209347322. Epub 2009 Sep 10.
8
Let your preference be your guide? Preferences and choices are more tightly linked for North Americans than for Indians.以你的偏好为指引?相比于印度人,北美人的偏好与选择之间的联系更为紧密。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Oct;95(4):861-76. doi: 10.1037/a0011618.
9
On the cultural guises of cognitive dissonance: the case of easterners and westerners.论认知失调的文化表象:以东方人和西方人为例
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Sep;89(3):294-310. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.294.
10
You can't always get what you want: educational attainment, agency, and choice.你不可能总是如愿以偿:教育成就、能动性与选择。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Apr;88(4):703-20. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.4.703.