Savani Krishna, Markus Hazel Rose, Conner Alana L
Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-2130, USA.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Oct;95(4):861-76. doi: 10.1037/a0011618.
Using experimental paradigms from economics and social psychology, the authors examined the cross-cultural applicability of 3 widely held assumptions about preference and choice: People (a) recruit or construct preferences to make choices; (b) choose according to their preferences; and (c) are motivated to express their preferences in their choices. In 6 studies, they compared how middle-class North American and Indian participants choose among consumer products. Participants in both contexts construct nonrandom preferences at similar speeds. Those in Indian contexts, however, are slower to make choices, less likely to choose according to their personal preferences, and less motivated to express their preferences in their choices. The authors infer that the strong link between preferences and choices observed among North Americans is not a universal feature of human nature. Instead, this link reflects the disjoint model of agency, which prescribes that people should choose freely on the basis of their preferences. In contrast, Indian contexts reflect and promote a conjoint model of agency, according to which agency is responsive to the desires and expectations of important others and may require restraining one's preferences.
作者运用经济学和社会心理学的实验范式,检验了关于偏好和选择的3个广泛认可的假设在跨文化情境中的适用性:人们(a)为做出选择而招募或构建偏好;(b)根据自身偏好进行选择;(c)有动机在选择中表达自己的偏好。在6项研究中,他们比较了北美和印度的中产阶级参与者在消费品中的选择方式。两种文化背景下的参与者构建非随机偏好的速度相近。然而,印度参与者做出选择的速度较慢,根据个人偏好进行选择的可能性较小,且在选择中表达偏好的动机较弱。作者推断,北美人群中观察到的偏好与选择之间的紧密联系并非人性的普遍特征。相反,这种联系反映了分离的行为主体模型,该模型规定人们应基于自身偏好自由选择。相比之下,印度文化背景反映并促进了一种联合行为主体模型,根据这一模型,行为主体对重要他人的欲望和期望做出反应,可能需要抑制个人偏好。