Kim Ki-Hun, Mohanty Sanghamitra, Mohanty Prasant, Trivedi Chintan, Morris Eli Hamilton, Santangeli Pasquale, Bai Rong, Al-Ahmad Amin, Burkhardt John David, Gallinghouse Joseph G, Horton Rodney, Sanchez Javier E, Bailey Shane, Hranitzky Patrick M, Zagrodzky Jason, Kim Soo G, Di Biase Luigi, Natale Andrea
Department of Internal Medicine, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, South Korea.
Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St. David's Medical Center, 3000 N. I-35, Suite 720, Austin, TX, 78705, USA.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2017 Aug;49(2):111-117. doi: 10.1007/s10840-017-0234-x. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
Thyroid hormone (TH) is known to enhance arrhythmogenicity, and high-normal thyroid function is related with an increased recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after catheter ablation. However, the impact of thyroid hormone replacement (THR) on AF ablation is not well known.
This study evaluated 1163 consecutive paroxysmal AF patients [160 (14%) on THR and 1003 (86%) without THR] undergoing their first catheter ablation. A total of 146 patients on THR and 146 controls were generated by propensity matching, based on calculated risk factor scores, using a logistic model (age, sex, body mass index, and left atrium size). The presence of non-pulmonary vein (PV) triggers was disclosed by a high-dose isoproterenol challenge (up to 30 μg/min) after PV isolation.
Clinical characteristics were not different between the groups. When compared to the control, non-PV triggers were significantly greater in the THR patients [112 (77%) vs. 47 (32%), P < 0.001], and most frequently originated from the right atrium (95 vs. 56%, P < 0.001). Other sources of non-PV triggers were the interatrial septum (25 vs. 11%, P = 0.002), coronary sinus (70 vs. 52%, P = 0.01), left atrial appendage (47 vs. 34%, P = 0.03), crista terminalis/superior vena cava (11 vs. 8%, P = 0.43), and mitral valve annulus (7 vs. 5%, P = 0.45) (THR vs. control), respectively. After mean follow-up of 14.7 ± 5.2 months, success rate was lower in patients on THR therapy [94 (64.4%)] compared to patients not receiving THR therapy [110 (75.3%), log-rank test value = 0.04].
Right atrial non-PV triggers were more prevalent in AF patients treated with THR. Elimination of non-PV triggers provided better arrhythmia-free survival in the non-THR group.
已知甲状腺激素(TH)可增强致心律失常性,甲状腺功能处于高正常范围与导管消融术后心房颤动(AF)复发增加有关。然而,甲状腺激素替代治疗(THR)对AF消融的影响尚不清楚。
本研究评估了1163例连续接受首次导管消融的阵发性AF患者[160例(14%)接受THR治疗,1003例(86%)未接受THR治疗]。基于计算的危险因素评分,使用逻辑模型(年龄、性别、体重指数和左心房大小),通过倾向匹配产生了146例接受THR治疗的患者和146例对照。在肺静脉(PV)隔离后,通过高剂量异丙肾上腺素激发试验(高达30μg/min)揭示非肺静脉(PV)触发灶的存在。
两组的临床特征无差异。与对照组相比,接受THR治疗的患者中非PV触发灶明显更多[112例(77%)对47例(32%),P<0.001],且最常见于右心房(95%对56%,P<0.001)。非PV触发灶的其他来源分别为房间隔(25%对11%,P=0.002)、冠状窦(70%对52%,P=0.01)、左心耳(47%对34%,P=0.03)、界嵴/上腔静脉(11%对8%,P=0.43)和二尖瓣环(7%对5%,P=0.45)(THR组对对照组)。平均随访14.7±5.2个月后,接受THR治疗的患者成功率[94例(64.4%)]低于未接受THR治疗的患者[110例(75.3%)],对数秩检验值=0.04。
接受THR治疗的AF患者中右心房非PV触发灶更为普遍。消除非PV触发灶在未接受THR治疗的组中可提供更好的无心律失常生存期。