Stoecker Charles, Stewart Alexandra M, Lindley Megan C
Department of Global Health Systems and Development, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70118, USA.
Department of Health Policy, The George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services, Washington, DC 20052, USA.
Vaccines (Basel). 2017 Mar 6;5(1):8. doi: 10.3390/vaccines5010008.
Prior research indicates that cost-sharing and lack of insurance coverage reduce preventive services use among low-income persons. State Medicaid policy may affect the uptake of recommended adult vaccinations. We examined the impact of three aspects of Medicaid benefit design (coverage for vaccines, prohibiting cost-sharing, and copayment amounts) on vaccine uptake in the fee-for-service Medicaid population 19-64 years old. We combined previously published reports to obtain state Medicaid policy information from 2003 and 2012. Data on influenza vaccination uptake were taken from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. We used a differences-in-differences framework, controlling for national trends and state differences, to estimate the effect of each benefit design factor on vaccination uptake in different Medicaid-eligible populations. Each additional dollar of copayment for vaccination decreased influenza vaccination coverage 1-6 percentage points. The effects of covering vaccines or prohibiting cost-sharing were mixed. Imposing copayments for vaccination is associated with lower vaccination coverage. These findings have implications for the implementation of Medicaid expansion in states that currently impose copayments.
先前的研究表明,费用分担和缺乏保险覆盖会降低低收入人群对预防性服务的使用。州医疗补助政策可能会影响推荐的成人疫苗接种率。我们研究了医疗补助福利设计的三个方面(疫苗覆盖、禁止费用分担和共付金额)对19至64岁按服务收费的医疗补助人群疫苗接种率的影响。我们结合先前发表的报告,获取了2003年和2012年的州医疗补助政策信息。流感疫苗接种率的数据来自行为风险因素监测系统。我们使用了双重差分框架,控制全国趋势和州差异,以估计每个福利设计因素对不同符合医疗补助条件人群疫苗接种率的影响。疫苗接种的共付金额每增加一美元,流感疫苗接种覆盖率就会降低1至6个百分点。疫苗覆盖或禁止费用分担的效果参差不齐。对疫苗接种征收共付费用与较低的疫苗接种覆盖率相关。这些发现对目前征收共付费用的州实施医疗补助扩大计划具有启示意义。