Suppr超能文献

法医DNA匹配概率中的10倍系数。

The factor of 10 in forensic DNA match probabilities.

作者信息

Gittelson Simone, Moretti Tamyra R, Onorato Anthony J, Budowle Bruce, Weir Bruce S, Buckleton John

机构信息

National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, MS 8980 Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.

DNA Support Unit, Federal Bureau of Investigation Laboratory, 2501 Investigation Parkway, Quantico, VA 22135, USA.

出版信息

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2017 May;28:178-187. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.02.007. Epub 2017 Feb 16.

Abstract

An update was performed of the classic experiments that led to the view that profile probability assignments are usually within a factor of 10 of each other. The data used in this study consist of 15 Identifiler loci collected from a wide range of forensic populations. Following Budowle et al. [1], the terms cognate and non-cognate are used. The cognate database is the database from which the profiles are simulated. The profile probability assignment was usually larger in the cognate database. In 44%-65% of the cases, the profile probability for 15 loci in the non-cognate database was within a factor of 10 of the profile probability in the cognate database. This proportion was between 60% and 80% when the FBI and NIST data were used as the non-cognate databases. A second experiment compared the match probability assignment using a generalised database and recommendation 4.2 from NRC II (the 4.2 assignment) with a proxy for the matching proportion developed using subpopulation allele frequencies and the product rule. The findings support that the 4.2 assignment has a large conservative bias. These results are in agreement with previous research results.

摘要

对那些得出以下观点的经典实验进行了更新

profile概率赋值通常彼此相差不超过10倍。本研究中使用的数据包括从广泛的法医群体中收集的15个Identifiler基因座。按照Budowle等人[1]的说法,使用了同源和非同源这两个术语。同源数据库是从中模拟profile的数据库。在同源数据库中,profile概率赋值通常更大。在44% - 65%的情况下,非同源数据库中15个基因座的profile概率与同源数据库中的profile概率相差不超过10倍。当将联邦调查局(FBI)和美国国家标准与技术研究院(NIST)的数据用作非同源数据库时,这一比例在60%至80%之间。第二个实验比较了使用广义数据库的匹配概率赋值以及美国国家研究委员会第二版(NRC II)中的建议4.2(4.2赋值)与使用亚群体等位基因频率和乘积法则得出的匹配比例代理值。研究结果支持4.2赋值存在很大的保守偏差。这些结果与先前的研究结果一致。

相似文献

1
The factor of 10 in forensic DNA match probabilities.
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2017 May;28:178-187. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.02.007. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
3
Partial matches in heterogeneous offender databases do not call into question the validity of random match probability calculations.
Int J Legal Med. 2009 Jan;123(1):59-63. doi: 10.1007/s00414-008-0239-1. Epub 2008 May 6.
4
The effect of wild card designations and rare alleles in forensic DNA database searches.
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2015 May;16:98-104. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.12.003. Epub 2014 Dec 16.
5
On the probability of matching DNA fingerprints.
Science. 1992 Feb 7;255(5045):717-20. doi: 10.1126/science.1738844.
6
Characterizing the genetic structure of a forensic DNA database using a latent variable approach.
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016 Jul;23:130-149. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.03.007. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
9
A comparison of adjustment methods to test the robustness of an STR DNA database comprised of 24 European populations.
Forensic Sci Int. 2003 Jan 28;131(2-3):184-96. doi: 10.1016/s0379-0738(02)00423-1.
10
Genetic differences at four DNA typing loci in Finnish, Italian, and mixed Caucasian populations.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Nov 15;89(22):10583-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.22.10583.

本文引用的文献

1
Population data on the expanded CODIS core STR loci for eleven populations of significance for forensic DNA analyses in the United States.
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016 Nov;25:175-181. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.07.022. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
2
Evidential evaluation of DNA profiles using a discrete statistical model implemented in the DNA LiRa software.
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2014 Jul;11:220-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.04.005. Epub 2014 Apr 19.
3
The interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2013 Sep;7(5):516-28. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.05.011. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
4
U.S. population data for 29 autosomal STR loci.
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2013 May;7(3):e82-3. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2012.12.004. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
5
Calculating the weight of evidence in low-template forensic DNA casework.
J Forensic Sci. 2013 Jan;58 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S243-9. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12017. Epub 2012 Oct 19.
6
Validating TrueAllele® DNA mixture interpretation.
J Forensic Sci. 2011 Nov;56(6):1430-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01859.x. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
7
Confidence interval of the likelihood ratio associated with mixed stain DNA evidence.
J Forensic Sci. 2011 Jan;56 Suppl 1(0 1):S166-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01600.x. Epub 2010 Oct 22.
8
Forensim: an open-source initiative for the evaluation of statistical methods in forensic genetics.
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2011 Aug;5(4):265-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2010.03.017. Epub 2010 May 5.
9
Interpreting low template DNA profiles.
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2009 Dec;4(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2009.03.003. Epub 2009 May 2.
10
How reliable is the sub-population model in DNA testimony?
Forensic Sci Int. 2006 Mar 10;157(2-3):144-8. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.04.004.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验