Beecham Gary W, Weir Bruce S
Miami Institute for Human Genomics, University of Miami, FL 33136, USA.
J Forensic Sci. 2011 Jan;56 Suppl 1(0 1):S166-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01600.x. Epub 2010 Oct 22.
Likelihood ratios are necessary to properly interpret mixed stain DNA evidence. They can flexibly consider alternate hypotheses and can account for population substructure. The likelihood ratio should be seen as an estimate and not a fixed value, because the calculations are functions of allelic frequency estimates that were estimated from a small portion of the population. Current methods do not account for uncertainty in the likelihood ratio estimates and are therefore an incomplete picture of the strength of the evidence. We propose the use of a confidence interval to report the consequent variation of likelihood ratios. The confidence interval is calculated using the standard forensic likelihood ratio formulae and a variance estimate derived using the Taylor expansion. The formula is explained, and a computer program has been made available. Numeric work shows that the evidential strength of DNA profiles decreases as the variation among populations increases.
似然比对于正确解释混合污渍DNA证据是必要的。它们可以灵活地考虑替代假设,并能够解释群体亚结构。似然比应被视为一个估计值而非固定值,因为计算是基于从一小部分人群中估计出的等位基因频率,而这些估计存在不确定性。当前的方法没有考虑似然比估计中的不确定性,因此对证据强度的描述并不完整。我们建议使用置信区间来报告似然比的相应变化。置信区间是使用标准法医似然比公式以及通过泰勒展开推导得到的方差估计来计算的。文中对该公式进行了解释,并提供了一个计算机程序。数值计算表明,随着群体间差异的增加,DNA图谱的证据强度会降低。