Huang Nan-Chieh, Bottino Marco C, Levon John A, Chu Tien-Min G
Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Detroit Mercy School of Dentistry, Detroit, MI.
Department of Biomedical and Applied Sciences, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, IN.
J Prosthodont. 2017 Apr;26(3):230-237. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12587. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
Glass fibers were introduced to increase the fracture resistance of resin-based composites restorations; however, the poor polymerization between fibers and resin-based composite were sometimes noted and can cause debonding and failure. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of different polymerization methods as well as fiber types on the mechanical behavior of fiber-reinforced resin-based composites.
Seventy-five specimens were fabricated and divided into one control group and four experimental groups (n = 15), according to the type of glass fiber (strip or mesh) and polymerization methods (one- or two-step). A 0.2-mm-thick fiber layer was fabricated with different polymerization methods, on top of which a 1.8 mm resin-based composite layer was added to make a bar-shape specimen, followed by a final polymerization. Specimens were tested for flexural strength and flexural modulus. The failure modes of specimens were observed by scanning electron microscopy.
The fiber types showed significant effect on the flexural strength of test specimens (F = 469.48, p < 0.05), but the polymerization methods had no significant effect (F = 0.05, p = 0.82). The interaction between these two variables was not significant (F = 1.73, p = 0.19). In addition, both fiber type (F = 9.71, p < 0.05) and polymerization method (F = 12.17, p < 0.05) affected the flexural modulus of test specimens; however, the interaction between these two variables was not significant (F = 0.40, p = 0.53).
The strip fibers showed better mechanical behavior than mesh fibers and were suggested for resin-based composites restorations reinforcement; however, different polymerization methods did not have a significant effect on the strength and failure mode of fiber-reinforced resin-based composites.
引入玻璃纤维以提高树脂基复合材料修复体的抗折性;然而,有时会注意到纤维与树脂基复合材料之间的聚合效果不佳,这可能导致脱粘和失效。本研究的目的是研究不同聚合方法以及纤维类型对纤维增强树脂基复合材料力学性能的影响。
制作75个试件,根据玻璃纤维类型(条带或网片)和聚合方法(一步或两步)分为1个对照组和4个实验组(n = 15)。采用不同的聚合方法制作0.2毫米厚的纤维层,在其顶部添加1.8毫米厚的树脂基复合材料层制成棒状试件,然后进行最终聚合。对试件进行弯曲强度和弯曲模量测试。通过扫描电子显微镜观察试件的失效模式。
纤维类型对试件的弯曲强度有显著影响(F = 469.48,p < 0.05),但聚合方法没有显著影响(F = 0.05,p = 0.82)。这两个变量之间的相互作用不显著(F = 1.73,p = 0.19)。此外,纤维类型(F = 9.71,p < 0.05)和聚合方法(F = 12.17,p < 0.05)均影响试件的弯曲模量;然而,这两个变量之间的相互作用不显著(F = 0.40,p = 0.53)。
条带纤维比网片纤维表现出更好的力学性能,建议用于树脂基复合材料修复体的增强;然而,不同的聚合方法对纤维增强树脂基复合材料的强度和失效模式没有显著影响。