Par Matej, Lapas-Barisic Matea, Gamulin Ozren, Panduric Vlatko, Spanovic Nika, Tarle Zrinka
Private Dental Practice, Dankovecka 9, Zagreb, Croatia.
Department of Physics and Biophysics, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Salata 3b, Zagreb, Croatia; Center of Excellence for Advanced Materials and Sensing Devices, Research Unit New Functional Materials, Bijenicka cesta 54, Zagreb, Croatia.
Acta Stomatol Croat. 2016 Dec;50(4):292-300. doi: 10.15644/asc50/4/2.
To investigate the long-term development of the post-cure degree of conversion (DC) for two flowable bulk-fill composites.
Tetric EvoFlow Bulk Fill (TEFBF) and SDR were chosen due to their distinct compositional modifications that enable the decrease of translucency during polymerization and lower polymerization rate, respectively. DC was assessed using FT-Raman spectroscopy at the post-cure times of 0 h, 24 h, 7 d and 30 d. The post-cure behavior was analyzed by a mixed model ANOVA and partial eta-squared statistics.
DC ranged from 61.3-81.1% for TEFBF and 58.9-81.6% for SDR. The initial (0 h) DC was significantly lower at a depth of 4 mm than at a depth of 1 mm (4.9% for SDR and 11.1% for TEFBF). Both materials presented a significant post-cure DC increase, up to 16.4% for TEFBF and 20.6% for SDR. The post-cure DC development was depth-dependent for TEFBF, but not for SDR. The post-cure DC increase was observed during 24 h for TEFBF and 7 d for SDR.
Some of the bulk-fill composites may need longer times than the commonly accepted 24 h to reach the final conversion. This may be attributed to their compositional modifications that are mostly undisclosed by manufacturers. Our findings imply that investigations commonly performed 24 h post-cure may underestimate some of the bulk-fill composite properties, if these are affected by the slowly-developing DC. Reactive species may also be available for leaching out of the restoration during an extended time period, with possible implications on biocompatibility.
研究两种可流动大块充填复合树脂固化后转化率(DC)的长期发展情况。
选择Tetric EvoFlow Bulk Fill(TEFBF)和SDR,因其分别具有独特的成分改性,可在聚合过程中降低透明度并降低聚合速率。在固化后0小时、24小时、7天和30天时,使用傅里叶变换拉曼光谱法评估DC。通过混合模型方差分析和偏 eta 平方统计分析固化后行为。
TEFBF的DC范围为61.3 - 81.1%,SDR的DC范围为58.9 - 81.6%。在4毫米深度处的初始(0小时)DC显著低于1毫米深度处(SDR为4.9%,TEFBF为11.1%)。两种材料的固化后DC均显著增加,TEFBF增加高达16.4%,SDR增加高达20.6%。TEFBF的固化后DC发展与深度有关,而SDR则无关。TEFBF在24小时内观察到固化后DC增加,SDR在7天内观察到增加。
一些大块充填复合树脂可能需要比普遍接受的24小时更长的时间才能达到最终转化率。这可能归因于其成分改性,而制造商大多未披露这些改性。我们的研究结果表明,如果某些大块充填复合树脂的性能受缓慢发展的DC影响,那么通常在固化后24小时进行的研究可能会低估这些性能。在较长时间内,反应性物质也可能从修复体中浸出,这可能对生物相容性产生影响。