Liang Bo-Cheng, Shi Zhen-Yu, Wang Bo, Wu Peng, Kong Ling-Cheng, Yao Jian-Liang, Li Chun-Wen, Shi Xiao-Lin
Department of Osteology, Second Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Department of Osteology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Orthop Surg. 2017 Feb;9(1):103-109. doi: 10.1111/os.12307. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessed the necessity of early intervention, safety and efficacy of intravenous zoledronic acid 5 mg/year in East China women with newly diagnosed osteoporosis at high risk of fracture during a 24-month treatment period.
Subjects (57 [52-62] years old) were randomized 3:2 to zoledronic acid versus placebo (randomized at baseline, zoledronic acid [175 cases], placebo-zoledronic acid [110 cases]). The bone mineral density of the lumbar spine and total hip was measured every 6 months with the use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Serum procollagen I N-terminal pro-peptide (PINP) and serum C-telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX) levels were measured every 6 months. The primary end point was the rate of change in the bone mineral density at the posteroanterior spine.
For subjects with measurements at 24 months, zoledronic acid significantly increased bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine (mean percent change ± SD, zoledronic acid 5.390% ± 0.854% versus placebo-zoledronic acid -1.038% ± 0.599%), the total hip (zoledronic acid 1.900% ± 0.262% versus placebo-zoledronic acid -1.631% ± 0.649%). Serum procollagen I N-terminal pro-peptide (PINP) and CTX decreased rapidly with zoledronic acid 5 mg treatment (P < 0.001 versus placebo at 6 month and 24 months) and changed from baseline in the zoledronic acid 5 mg and placebo-zoledronic acid 5 mg at 6 months by a mean of -66.348% and -75.375%, respectively (P < 0.001), and at 24 months by -49.950% and -52.325%, respectively (P < 0.001). No cases of serious adverse events were observed in two groups. Headache, pyrexia and myalgia occurred more commonly within the first 3 days after infusion with zoledronic acid 5 mg than with placebo (13.7% versus 2.1%, P = 0.0018; 28.0% versus 3.2%, P < 0.001; 21.7% versus 4.2%, P < 0.001, respectively).
These data show that early application of zoledronic acid 5 mg/year was well stimulated and tolerated for bone mass in newly diagnosed east china subjects with osteoporosis in a 24-month treatment.
本随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究评估了在中国东部新诊断为骨质疏松且骨折风险高的女性中,每年静脉注射5毫克唑来膦酸进行早期干预的必要性、安全性和有效性,治疗期为24个月。
受试者(57[52 - 62]岁)按3:2随机分为唑来膦酸组和安慰剂组(基线时随机分组,唑来膦酸组[175例],安慰剂 - 唑来膦酸组[110例])。每6个月使用双能X线吸收法测量腰椎和全髋部的骨密度。每6个月测量血清I型前胶原N端前肽(PINP)和I型胶原C端肽(CTX)水平。主要终点是前后位脊柱骨密度的变化率。
对于在24个月时进行测量的受试者,唑来膦酸显著增加了腰椎的骨密度(平均变化百分比±标准差,唑来膦酸组为5.390%±0.854%,安慰剂 - 唑来膦酸组为 - 1.038%±0.599%),全髋部也如此(唑来膦酸组为1.900%±0.262%,安慰剂 - 唑来膦酸组为 - 1.631%±0.649%)。使用5毫克唑来膦酸治疗后,血清I型前胶原N端前肽(PINP)和CTX迅速下降(6个月和24个月时与安慰剂相比P<0.001),在6个月时,5毫克唑来膦酸组和安慰剂 - 唑来膦酸组与基线相比分别平均下降了 - 66.348%和 - 75.375%(P<0.001),在24个月时分别下降了 - 49.950%和 - 52.325%(P<0.001)。两组均未观察到严重不良事件病例。与安慰剂相比,静脉注射5毫克唑来膦酸后,头痛、发热和肌痛在前3天内更常见(分别为13.7%对2.1%,P = 0.0018;28.0%对3.2%,P<0.001;21.7%对4.2%,P<0.001)。
这些数据表明,对于中国东部新诊断的骨质疏松受试者,在24个月的治疗中,每年早期应用5毫克唑来膦酸对骨量有良好的促进作用且耐受性良好。