Suppr超能文献

肉毒杆菌毒素A注射唾液腺治疗流涎症。

BOTOX-A injection of salivary glands for drooling.

作者信息

Alvarenga Ana, Campos Miguel, Dias Mariana, Melão Lina, Estevão-Costa José

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hospital S. João, Faculty of Medicine, Porto, Portugal.

Department of Radiology, Hospital S. João, Porto, Portugal.

出版信息

J Pediatr Surg. 2017 Aug;52(8):1283-1286. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.09.074. Epub 2016 Oct 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Drooling is a challenging entity to manage. Botulinum toxin A (BOTOX-A) infiltration of salivary glands is a promising alternative to surgical treatment. This study aims to assess the outcome of BOTOX-A salivary glands infiltration in children with drooling.

METHODS

Patients treated between January 2012 and March 2015 were enrolled. BOTOX-A was injected in the parotid and submandibular glands under ultrasound control and general inhalational anesthesia. The outcome was evaluated through the DSFS: Drooling Severity (1-best to 5-worst) and Frequency (1 to 4) Scale, that was applied before treatment, and 1-, 3-, and 6-month after injection. The inclusion criteria were a DSS ≥4 and/or DFS ≥3. Statistical significance was set at 5%.

RESULTS

There were 17 patients aged 12.1±5.1 [4-19]years, all of them with neurologic impairment. After the first injection, 13 (76.5%) patients had reduction of the severity (S) and 12 (70.6%) of the frequency (F) scale; in 6 (35.5%) patients drooling resolved completely. Pre-treatment S+F score was 8.59±0.71 [7-9]; it decreased significantly to 4.65±2.32 (p=0.001) at 1-month post-injection evaluation. At 3-month and 6-month the scores were also significantly lower than the pre-treatment one (4.00±1.96, p=0.002; 5.36±2.20, p=0.005; respectively), but there was a significant increase between the 3-month and 6-month evaluations (p=0.01). With a follow-up of 20.1±9.2 [4-38] months, 4 out of the 13 successful injections needed a second one after 7.5±3.1 [3-10] months. The patient with the longest time not requiring re-injection had 28months of follow-up. One (6%) patient presented mild dysphagia that regressed spontaneously. All but two (88%) parents/caregivers would repeat the treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

BOTOX-A seems to be an effective minimal invasive treatment for drooling with few complications. After 6months the need for re-injection becomes substantial but it may not be necessary for several months. Further studies are needed to establish the most effective dosage and frequency of injections.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

摘要

背景与目的

流涎是一种难以处理的情况。A型肉毒毒素(BOTOX-A)注射到唾液腺是一种有前景的手术治疗替代方法。本研究旨在评估BOTOX-A注射到唾液腺对流涎儿童的治疗效果。

方法

纳入2012年1月至2015年3月期间接受治疗的患者。在超声引导和全身吸入麻醉下,将BOTOX-A注射到腮腺和下颌下腺。通过流涎严重程度评分量表(DSFS:1-最佳至5-最差)和频率(1至4)量表进行评估,在治疗前以及注射后1个月、3个月和6个月进行。纳入标准为流涎严重程度评分(DSS)≥4和/或流涎频率评分(DFS)≥3。设定统计学显著性水平为5%。

结果

共17例患者,年龄12.1±5.1[4-19]岁,均有神经功能障碍。首次注射后,13例(76.5%)患者的严重程度评分(S)降低,12例(70.6%)患者的频率评分(F)降低;6例(35.5%)患者流涎完全消失。治疗前S+F评分为8.59±0.71[7-9];注射后1个月评估时显著降至4.65±2.32(p=0.001)。在3个月和6个月时评分也显著低于治疗前(分别为4.00±1.96,p=0.002;5.36±2.20,p=0.005),但在3个月和6个月评估之间有显著增加(p=0.01)。随访20.1±9.2[4-38]个月,13例成功注射的患者中有4例在7.5±3.1[3-10]个月后需要再次注射。未需要再次注射时间最长的患者随访了28个月。1例(6%)患者出现轻度吞咽困难,自行缓解。除2例(88%)外,所有家长/照顾者均会再次接受该治疗。

结论

BOTOX-A似乎是一种治疗流涎的有效微创方法,并发症少。6个月后再次注射的需求显著增加,但可能在几个月内无需再次注射。需要进一步研究以确定最有效的注射剂量和频率。

证据等级

IV级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验