Suppr超能文献

肥胖患者腹腔镜结肠切除术:腹腔镜与手助腹腔镜技术的比较。

Laparoscopic colectomy in obese patients: a comparison of laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic techniques.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, 12631 E 17th Ave, C302, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.

Department of Surgery, VA Eastern Colorado HealthCare System, Denver, CO, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):3912-3921. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5422-3. Epub 2017 Mar 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (ACS-NSQIP)-based evidence indicates that laparoscopic (LAP) colectomy results in improved outcomes compared to hand-assisted laparoscopic (HAL) colectomy in the general population. Previous comparative studies demonstrated that the HAL technique offers distinct advantages for obese patients. The aim of this study was to perform comparative analyses of HAL and LAP colectomy and low anterior resection (LAR) in obese patients.

METHODS

The ACS-NSQIP public use file and targeted colectomy dataset, 2012-2014, were utilized for patients undergoing colectomy and LAR. Only obese patients (BMI > 30) and laparoscopic or hand-assisted operations were included. Patient, operation, and outcome variables were compared in two separate cohorts: colectomy and LAR. Bivariate analysis compared the approaches, followed by multivariable regression.

RESULTS

Of 9610 obese patients included, HAL and LAP colectomy were performed in 3126 and 3793 patients and LAR in 1431 and 1260 patients, respectively. In comparison to LAP colectomy, HAL colectomy patients had increased comorbidities including class 2 and 3 obesity. HAL colectomy was associated with higher overall morbidity (20 vs. 16%, p < 0.001), infectious complications (10.2 vs. 7.7%, p < 0.001), anastomotic leaks (3.0 vs. 2.2%, p = 0.03), and ileus (11 vs. 8%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that overall morbidity (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.11-1.44), infectious complications (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.14-1.59), and ileus (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.12-1.57) were each increased in the HAL colectomy cohort but not different for HAL and LAP LAR.

CONCLUSIONS

In comparison to LAP colectomy, the HAL technique is used more often in obese patients with an increased operative risk profile. While inherent bias and unmeasured variables limit the analysis, the available data indicate that the HAL technique is associated with increased perioperative morbidity. Alternatively, HAL and LAP LAR are performed in obese patients with a similar risk profile and result in similar postoperative outcomes.

摘要

背景

最近美国外科医师学院国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)的研究结果表明,与手助腹腔镜(HAL)结直肠切除术相比,腹腔镜(LAP)结直肠切除术在普通人群中具有更好的效果。之前的比较研究表明,HAL 技术为肥胖患者提供了明显的优势。本研究旨在对肥胖患者的 HAL 和 LAP 结直肠切除术和低位前切除术(LAR)进行比较分析。

方法

使用 ACS-NSQIP 公共使用文件和 2012-2014 年的靶向结直肠切除术数据集,对接受结直肠切除术和 LAR 的患者进行研究。仅纳入肥胖患者(BMI>30)和腹腔镜或手助手术患者。在两个独立队列中比较患者、手术和结局变量:结直肠切除术和 LAR。对两种方法进行了双变量分析,然后进行了多变量回归。

结果

在 9610 名肥胖患者中,3126 名患者接受 HAL 结直肠切除术,3793 名患者接受 LAP 结直肠切除术,1431 名患者接受 LAR,1260 名患者接受 LAP 结直肠切除术。与 LAP 结直肠切除术相比,HAL 结直肠切除术患者合并症更多,包括 2 级和 3 级肥胖。HAL 结直肠切除术与更高的总发病率(20%比 16%,p<0.001)、感染性并发症(10.2%比 7.7%,p<0.001)、吻合口漏(3.0%比 2.2%,p=0.03)和肠梗阻(11%比 8%,p<0.001)相关。多变量分析表明,总发病率(OR 1.27,95%CI 1.11-1.44)、感染性并发症(OR 1.35,95%CI 1.14-1.59)和肠梗阻(OR 1.33,95%CI 1.12-1.57)在 HAL 结直肠切除术队列中均增加,但 HAL 和 LAP LAR 之间并无差异。

结论

与 LAP 结直肠切除术相比,HAL 技术在肥胖患者中应用更为广泛,这些患者的手术风险更高。虽然固有偏差和未测量的变量限制了分析,但现有数据表明,HAL 技术与围手术期发病率增加有关。另一方面,HAL 和 LAP LAR 用于肥胖患者的风险特征相似,术后结果相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验