Centre for the Business and Economics of Health, University of Queensland, St Lucia QLD, Australia.
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 10;7:44471. doi: 10.1038/srep44471.
The present study investigates the external validity of emotional value measured in economic laboratory experiments by using a physiological indicator of stress, heart rate variability (HRV). While there is ample evidence supporting the external validity of economic experiments, there is little evidence comparing the magnitude of internal levels of emotional stress during decision making with external stress. The current study addresses this gap by comparing the magnitudes of decision stress experienced in the laboratory with the stress from outside the laboratory. To quantify a large change in HRV, measures observed in the laboratory during decision-making are compared to the difference between HRV during a university exam and other mental activity for the same individuals in and outside of the laboratory. The results outside the laboratory inform about the relevance of laboratory findings in terms of their relative magnitude. Results show that psychologically induced HRV changes observed in the laboratory, particularly in connection with social preferences, correspond to large effects outside. This underscores the external validity of laboratory findings and shows the magnitude of emotional value connected to pro-social economic decisions in the laboratory.
本研究通过使用压力的生理指标——心率变异性(HRV),来调查经济实验室实验中测量的情感价值的外部有效性。虽然有大量证据支持经济实验的外部有效性,但很少有证据比较决策过程中内部情感压力的大小与外部压力。本研究通过比较实验室和实验室外决策压力的大小来弥补这一差距。为了量化 HRV 的大变化,将实验室决策过程中观察到的指标与同一个体在实验室内外进行大学考试和其他心理活动时的 HRV 差异进行比较。实验室外的结果说明了实验室发现的相关性,就其相对大小而言。结果表明,实验室中观察到的心理诱导 HRV 变化,特别是与社会偏好相关的变化,与外部的大效应相对应。这强调了实验室发现的外部有效性,并显示了与实验室中亲社会经济决策相关的情感价值的大小。