Cassinotto Christophe, Dohan Anthony, Gallix Benoît, Simoneau Eve, Boucher Louis-Martin, Metrakos Peter, Cabrera Tatiana, Torres Carlos, Muchantef Karl, Valenti David A
Department of RadiologyRoyal Victoria Hospital, McGill University Health Center, 1001 Boulevard Decarie, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada; Departments of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Pathology, Digestive Oncology, and Visceral Surgery, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Pessac, France.
Department of RadiologyRoyal Victoria Hospital, McGill University Health Center, 1001 Boulevard Decarie, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017 Jul;28(7):963-970. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2017.01.001. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
To assess frequency of adverse events, efficacy, and clinical outcomes of percutaneous portal vein embolization (PVE) in patients with bilobar colorectal liver metastases undergoing staged hepatectomy with preservation of segment IV ± I only.
Retrospective analysis was performed of 40 consecutive patients who underwent right PVE after successful left lobectomy between 2005 and 2013. Rates of adverse events, future liver remnant (FLR) > 30% compared with baseline liver volume, clinical success (completion of staged hepatectomy with clearance of liver metastases), and overall survival were analyzed.
PVE was performed using polyvinyl alcohol particles (n = 7; 17.5%), particles plus coils (n = 23; 57.5%), and N-butyl cyanoacrylate glue plus ethiodized oil (n = 10; 25%). Technical success was 100%. After PVE, 20% (n = 8) of patients exhibited portal venous thrombosis, ranging from isolated intrahepatic portal branch thrombosis to massive thrombosis of the main portal vein (n = 3) and responsible for periportal cavernoma and portal hypertension in 5 patients. Of patients, 23 (57.5%) had FLR ≥ 30%, and 21 (52.5%) had clinical success. Six patients had significant stenosis or occlusion of the left portal vein or biliary system after original left lobectomy, which was independently associated with FLR < 30% (R = 0.24). Clinical success was the only independent variable associated with survival (R = 0.25).
PVE for staged hepatectomy with preservation of segment IV ± I only is technically feasible, leading to adequate hypertrophy and clinical success rates in these patients with poor oncologic prognosis. Portal venous thrombosis is greater after the procedure than in the setting of standard PVE.
评估仅保留肝段IV±I行分期肝切除术的双叶结直肠癌肝转移患者经皮门静脉栓塞术(PVE)的不良事件发生率、疗效及临床结局。
对2005年至2013年间40例在成功进行左肝叶切除术后接受右半肝PVE的连续患者进行回顾性分析。分析不良事件发生率、与基线肝体积相比未来肝残余(FLR)> 30%的情况、临床成功率(分期肝切除并清除肝转移灶)及总生存率。
PVE使用聚乙烯醇颗粒(n = 7;17.5%)、颗粒加弹簧圈(n = 23;57.5%)以及氰基丙烯酸正丁酯胶加碘化油(n = 10;25%)。技术成功率为100%。PVE后,20%(n = 8)的患者出现门静脉血栓形成,范围从孤立的肝内门静脉分支血栓形成到门静脉主干大量血栓形成(n = 3),5例患者出现门静脉周围海绵样变和门静脉高压。患者中,23例(57.5%)的FLR≥30%,21例(52.5%)获得临床成功。6例患者在初次左肝叶切除术后出现左门静脉或胆道系统明显狭窄或闭塞,这与FLR < 30%独立相关(R = 0.24)。临床成功是与生存相关的唯一独立变量(R = 0.25)。
仅保留肝段IV±I行分期肝切除术的PVE在技术上是可行的,可使这些肿瘤预后较差的患者实现充分的肝脏肥大及临床成功率。该手术后门静脉血栓形成比标准PVE情况下更常见。