Krein Sarah L, Kuhn Latoya, Ratz David, Winter Suzanne, Vaughn Valerie M, Chopra Vineet
Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2017 Jun;71:28-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.03.001. Epub 2017 Mar 4.
The presence and proliferation of vascular access nursing in hospital settings has been identified as a potential contributor to growing demand, and possible overuse, of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs).
We examined vascular access nurses' perceived role related to use of PICCs and the association with appropriateness of PICC use in hospitals.
A web-based survey was administered to members of two vascular access professional organizations.
Of 2762 potentially eligible respondents who accessed the link, 1698 (61%) completed the survey. This sample was further restricted to vascular access nurses who worked in a U.S. hospital (n=1147).
Respondents were categorized based on perceived role: 1) an operator who inserts PICCs; 2) a consultant whose views are not valued by the care team (unvalued consultant); 3) a consultant whose views are valued by the care team (valued consultant). Facility and respondent characteristics, reported practices, leadership support and relationships with other providers were compared across groups using chi-squared tests and analysis of variance. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between perceived role and reported percentage of PICCs placed for inappropriate reasons.
Among the 1147 respondents, 210 (18%) viewed themselves as operators, 683 (59%) as valued consultants, 236 (21%) as unvalued consultants, and 18 (2%) could not be categorized. A significantly higher percentage (93%) of valued consultants reported that vascular access nurses placed the majority of PICCs at their facility, compared to operators (83%) or unvalued consultants (76%) (p<0.001). After adjustment, compared with operators, valued consultants were significantly more likely to report that <10% of PICCs at their facility were inserted for inappropriate reasons (OR 1.7, p=0.002); the finding was reversed for unvalued consultants (OR 0.69, p=0.06).
Vascular access nurses and their perceived role as part of the healthcare team are associated with PICC use in hospitals. Strong inter-professional collaboration and respect may help ensure more appropriate use of PICCs.
医院环境中血管通路护理的存在和扩张被认为是外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管(PICC)需求增长以及可能过度使用的一个潜在因素。
我们调查了血管通路护士对PICC使用的认知角色以及与医院中PICC使用适宜性的关联。
对两个血管通路专业组织的成员进行了一项基于网络的调查。
在2762名访问链接的潜在合格受访者中,1698人(61%)完成了调查。该样本进一步限定为在美国医院工作的血管通路护士(n = 1147)。
根据认知角色对受访者进行分类:1)插入PICC的操作者;2)其观点未得到护理团队重视的顾问(未受重视的顾问);3)其观点得到护理团队重视的顾问(受重视的顾问)。使用卡方检验和方差分析对不同组之间的机构和受访者特征、报告的做法、领导支持以及与其他提供者的关系进行比较。多变量逻辑回归用于评估认知角色与报告的因不适当原因放置PICC的百分比之间的关联。
在1147名受访者中,210人(18%)将自己视为操作者,683人(59%)视为受重视的顾问,236人(21%)视为未受重视的顾问,18人(2%)无法分类。与操作者(83%)或未受重视的顾问(76%)相比,受重视的顾问中报告血管通路护士在其机构放置了大多数PICC的比例显著更高(93%)(p < 0.001)。调整后,与操作者相比,受重视的顾问更有可能报告其机构中因不适当原因插入的PICC < 10%(OR 1.7,p = 0.002);未受重视的顾问则相反(OR 0.69,p = 0.06)。
血管通路护士及其作为医疗团队一部分的认知角色与医院中PICC的使用有关。强大的跨专业协作和尊重可能有助于确保更恰当地使用PICC。