Suppr超能文献

既往治疗及痰液质量对Xpert MTB/RIF诊断准确性的影响。

Effect of previous treatment and sputum quality on diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF.

作者信息

Acuña-Villaorduña C, Orikiriza P, Nyehangane D, White L F, Mwanga-Amumpaire J, Kim S, Bonnet M, Fennelly K P, Boum Y, Jones-López E C

机构信息

Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Epicentre, Médecins Sans Frontières, Mbarara, Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.

出版信息

Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2017 Apr 1;21(4):389-397. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.16.0785.

Abstract

SETTING

In early studies, Xpert® MTB/RIF accurately detected culture-proven pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). Recent reports have, however, found a lower than expected specificity in previously treated TB patients.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of Xpert in presumptive pulmonary TB patients in Southwestern Uganda.

DESIGN

We obtained demographic and clinical information and collected three sputum samples from each patient for smear microscopy, Xpert and culture. We estimated Xpert sensitivity and specificity against culture, and stratified the analysis by previous treatment and sputum quality status.

RESULTS

We analyzed results from 860 presumptive TB patients, including 109 (13%) with a previous history of anti-tuberculosis treatment; 205 (24%) were culture-positive. Xpert specificity was lower (91.8%, 95%CI 84.9-96.2) in previously treated than in new TB patients (97.5%, 95%CI 96.1-98.5; P = 0.01). In an adjusted analysis, patients with culture-, Xpert+ results were more likely to have been previously treated for TB (OR 8.3, 95%CI 2.1-32.0; P = 0.002), and to have mucosalivary sputum (OR 4.1, 95%CI 1.1-14.6; P = 0.03), but were less likely to self-report fever (OR 0.23, 95%CI 0.1-0.7; P = 0.008) than patients with concordant positive results.

CONCLUSION

Xpert specificity was lower in previously treated patients with suspected TB. The clinical and programmatic impact of culture-, Xpert+ results requires evaluation in future studies.

摘要

背景

在早期研究中,Xpert® MTB/RIF能准确检测经培养证实的肺结核(TB)。然而,近期报告发现,在既往接受过治疗的TB患者中,其特异性低于预期。

目的

调查Xpert在乌干达西南部疑似肺结核患者中的诊断准确性。

设计

我们获取了人口统计学和临床信息,并从每位患者收集三份痰样本用于涂片显微镜检查、Xpert检测和培养。我们评估了Xpert相对于培养的敏感性和特异性,并按既往治疗情况和痰质量状况进行分层分析。

结果

我们分析了860例疑似TB患者的结果,其中109例(13%)有抗结核治疗史;205例(24%)培养呈阳性。既往接受过治疗的患者中,Xpert特异性(91.8%,95%CI 84.9 - 96.2)低于新TB患者(97.5%,95%CI 96.1 - 98.5;P = 0.01)。在一项校正分析中,培养阳性、Xpert阳性结果的患者更有可能既往接受过TB治疗(OR 8.3,95%CI 2.1 - 32.0;P = 0.002),且痰液为黏膜样痰(OR 4.1,95%CI 1.1 - 14.6;P = 0.03),但与结果一致为阳性的患者相比,自我报告发热的可能性较小(OR 0.23,95%CI 0.1 - 0.7;P = 0.008)。

结论

在既往接受过治疗的疑似TB患者中,Xpert特异性较低。培养阳性、Xpert阳性结果对临床和项目的影响需要在未来研究中进行评估。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验