• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

干酪乳杆菌鼠李糖亚种Lcr35用于儿童功能性便秘的治疗:一项随机试验

Lactobacillus casei rhamnosus Lcr35 in the Management of Functional Constipation in Children: A Randomized Trial.

作者信息

Wojtyniak Katarzyna, Horvath Andrea, Dziechciarz Piotr, Szajewska Hania

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, The Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

J Pediatr. 2017 May;184:101-105.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.01.068. Epub 2017 Mar 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.01.068
PMID:28284477
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of Lactobacillus casei rhamnosus Lcr35 (Lcr35) in the management of functional constipation in children.

STUDY DESIGN

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in 94 children aged <5 years with functional constipation according to the Rome III criteria. Children were assigned to receive Lcr35 (8 × 10 colony-forming units, n = 48) or placebo (n = 46), twice daily, for 4 weeks. The primary outcome measure was treatment success, defined as 3 or more spontaneous stools per week, without episodes of fecal soiling, in the last week of the intervention. Analyses were by intention to treat.

RESULTS

Eighty-one (86%) children completed the study. There was no significant difference in treatment success between the placebo and the Lcr35 group (28/40 vs 24/41, respectively; relative risk, 0.6, 95% CI 0.24-1.5, P = .4). There was a significant increase in the frequency of defecation from baseline to week 4 in both the placebo group (median [IQR] 2.0 [1.0, 2.0] to 6.0 [4.0, 9.0], P < .001) and in the Lcr35 group (2.0 [1.0, 2.0] to 4.0 [3.0, 5.0], P < .001), but the defecation frequency in the placebo group was significantly greater than that in the Lcr35 group at weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4.

CONCLUSION

Lcr35 as a sole treatment was not more effective than placebo in the management of functional constipation in children <5 years. This study adds to current recommendations that do not support the use of probiotics in the treatment of childhood constipation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01985867.

摘要

目的

评估鼠李糖乳杆菌Lcr35(Lcr35)对儿童功能性便秘的治疗效果。

研究设计

一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验在94名年龄小于5岁、符合罗马III标准的功能性便秘儿童中进行。将儿童分为两组,分别接受Lcr35(8×10菌落形成单位,n = 48)或安慰剂(n = 46)治疗,每日两次,共4周。主要结局指标为治疗成功,定义为干预最后一周每周有3次或更多自主排便且无大便失禁情况。分析采用意向性分析。

结果

81名(86%)儿童完成了研究。安慰剂组和Lcr35组的治疗成功率无显著差异(分别为28/40和24/41;相对危险度,0.6,95%可信区间0.24 - 1.5,P = 0.4)。安慰剂组和Lcr35组从基线到第4周排便频率均显著增加(安慰剂组:中位数[四分位间距]从2.0[1.0, 2.0]增至6.0[4.0, 9.0],P < 0.001;Lcr35组:从2.0[1.0, 2.0]增至4.0[3.0, 5.0],P < 0.001),但在第1、2、3和4周时,安慰剂组的排便频率显著高于Lcr35组。

结论

在治疗5岁以下儿童功能性便秘方面,单独使用Lcr35并不比安慰剂更有效。本研究进一步支持了目前不推荐使用益生菌治疗儿童便秘的建议。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT01985867。

相似文献

1
Lactobacillus casei rhamnosus Lcr35 in the Management of Functional Constipation in Children: A Randomized Trial.干酪乳杆菌鼠李糖亚种Lcr35用于儿童功能性便秘的治疗:一项随机试验
J Pediatr. 2017 May;184:101-105.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.01.068. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
2
Lactobacillus casei rhamnosus Lcr35 in children with chronic constipation.干酪乳杆菌鼠李糖亚种Lcr35用于治疗慢性便秘儿童。
Pediatr Int. 2007 Aug;49(4):485-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-200X.2007.02397.x.
3
Efficacy and safety profile of LCR35 complete freeze-dried culture in irritable bowel syndrome: a randomized, double-blind study.LCR35 完整冻干培养物治疗肠易激综合征的疗效和安全性:一项随机、双盲研究。
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 May 7;18(17):2067-75. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i17.2067.
4
Ineffectiveness of Lactobacillus GG as an adjunct to lactulose for the treatment of constipation in children: a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial.鼠李糖乳杆菌GG作为乳果糖辅助药物治疗儿童便秘的无效性:一项双盲、安慰剂对照随机试验。
J Pediatr. 2005 Mar;146(3):364-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.10.022.
5
Efficacy and acceptability of different probiotic products plus laxatives for pediatric functional constipation: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.不同益生菌产品联合泻药治疗小儿功能性便秘的疗效和可接受性:随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Aug;183(8):3531-3541. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05568-6. Epub 2024 May 29.
6
Systematic review: probiotics for functional constipation in children.系统评价:益生菌治疗儿童功能性便秘。
Eur J Pediatr. 2017 Sep;176(9):1155-1162. doi: 10.1007/s00431-017-2972-2. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
7
The role of a probiotics mixture in the treatment of childhood constipation: a pilot study.益生菌混合物在儿童便秘治疗中的作用:一项初步研究。
Nutr J. 2007 Aug 4;6:17. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-6-17.
8
Lactobacillus rhamnosus PL1 and Lactobacillus plantarum PM1 versus placebo as a prophylaxis for recurrence urinary tract infections in children: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.鼠李糖乳杆菌 PL1 和植物乳杆菌 PM1 与安慰剂预防儿童复发性尿路感染的比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Urol. 2020 Oct 23;20(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00723-1.
9
Effects of a probiotic fermented milk on functional constipation: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.益生菌发酵乳对功能性便秘的影响:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Jul;28(7):1141-7. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12168.
10
The Effectiveness of Probiotic and Strains in Children with Atopic Dermatitis and Cow's Milk Protein Allergy: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Study.益生菌和菌株对特应性皮炎和牛奶蛋白过敏儿童的有效性:一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
Nutrients. 2021 Apr 1;13(4):1169. doi: 10.3390/nu13041169.

引用本文的文献

1
Faecal impaction in children aged 0-18 years: a systematic review and metanarrative analysis of definitions used.0至18岁儿童的粪便嵌塞:对所用定义的系统评价和元叙事分析
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2025 Apr 7;9(1):e003085. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2024-003085.
2
Probiotics interventions modulating gut microbiota composition in individuals with intestinal constipation: Protocol of a systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.益生菌干预对便秘个体肠道微生物群组成的调节作用:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析方案
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 24;20(1):e0311799. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311799. eCollection 2025.
3
Efficacy of Probiotics Compared With Pharmacological Treatments for Maintenance Therapy for Functional Constipation in Children: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.
益生菌与药物治疗对儿童功能性便秘维持治疗的疗效比较:一项系统评价与网状Meta分析
Nutr Rev. 2025 Jun 1;83(6):1006-1034. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuae119.
4
Network metanalysis on probiotics in functional constipation in children.网络荟萃分析益生菌在儿童功能性便秘中的作用。
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Oct;183(10):4587-4588. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05722-0. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
5
Probiotics in Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders.功能性胃肠病中的益生菌。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2024;1449:157-174. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-58572-2_10.
6
Relationship between maternal consumption of fermented foods and the development of the offspring at the age of 3 years: The Japan Environment and Children's Study.母亲食用发酵食品与 3 岁儿童发育的关系:日本环境与儿童研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 21;19(6):e0305535. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305535. eCollection 2024.
7
Efficacy and acceptability of different probiotic products plus laxatives for pediatric functional constipation: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.不同益生菌产品联合泻药治疗小儿功能性便秘的疗效和可接受性:随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Aug;183(8):3531-3541. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05568-6. Epub 2024 May 29.
8
[Research status and prospects of probiotics in functional gastrointestinal disorders in infants and toddlers].[益生菌在婴幼儿功能性胃肠病中的研究现状与展望]
Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2024 May 15;26(5):529-534. doi: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2401141.
9
Maternal fermented food intake and infant neurodevelopment: The Japan Environment and Children's Study.母体发酵食品摄入与婴儿神经发育:日本环境与儿童健康研究。
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2024 Mar;33(1):66-82. doi: 10.6133/apjcn.202401_33(1).0008.
10
Unraveling the complexity of Disorders of the Gut-Brain Interaction: the gut microbiota connection in children.解析儿童肠道-脑互动障碍的复杂性:肠道微生物群的联系
Front Pediatr. 2024 Feb 16;11:1283389. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1283389. eCollection 2023.