McDougall Sanders A, Rudberg Krista N, Veliz Ana, Dhargalkar Janhavi M, Garcia Aleesha S, Romero Loveth C, Gonzalez Ashley E, Mohd-Yusof Alena, Crawford Cynthia A
Department of Psychology, California State University, San Bernardino, CA, USA.
Department of Psychology, California State University, San Bernardino, CA, USA.
Behav Brain Res. 2017 May 30;326:226-236. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.03.001. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
The behavioral manifestations of psychostimulant-induced sensitization vary markedly between young and adult rats, suggesting that the neural mechanisms mediating this phenomenon differ across ontogeny. In this project we examined the importance of D1 and D2 receptors for the induction and expression of cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization during the preweanling period. In the behavioral experiments, rats were injected with reversible D1 and/or D2 antagonists (SCH23390 and/or raclopride) or an irreversible receptor antagonist (EEDQ) either before cocaine administration on the pretreatment day (induction) or before cocaine challenge on the test day (expression). In the EEDQ experiments, receptor specificity was assessed by using selective dopamine antagonists to protect D1 and/or D2 receptors from inactivation. Receptor binding assays showed that EEDQ caused substantial reductions in dorsal striatal D1 and D2 binding sites, while SCH23390 and raclopride fully protected D1 and D2 receptors from EEDQ-induced alkylation. Behavioral results showed that neither D1 nor D2 receptor stimulation was necessary for the induction of cocaine sensitization in preweanling rats. EEDQ disrupted the sensitization process, suggesting that another receptor type sensitive to EEDQ alkylation was necessary for the induction process. Expression of the sensitized response was prevented by an acute injection of a D1 receptor antagonist. The pattern of DA antagonist-induced effects described for preweanling rats is, with few exceptions, similar to what is observed when the same drugs are administered to adult rats. Thus, it appears that maturational changes in D1 and D2 receptor systems are not responsible for ontogenetic differences in the behavioral manifestation of cocaine sensitization.
精神兴奋剂诱导的敏化作用在幼年和成年大鼠中的行为表现差异显著,这表明介导该现象的神经机制在个体发育过程中有所不同。在本项目中,我们研究了D1和D2受体在断奶前可卡因诱导的行为敏化作用的诱导和表达过程中的重要性。在行为实验中,大鼠在预处理日给予可卡因之前(诱导阶段)或在测试日给予可卡因激发之前(表达阶段),注射可逆性D1和/或D2拮抗剂(SCH23390和/或雷氯必利)或不可逆性受体拮抗剂(EEDQ)。在EEDQ实验中,通过使用选择性多巴胺拮抗剂保护D1和/或D2受体不被失活来评估受体特异性。受体结合试验表明,EEDQ导致背侧纹状体D1和D2结合位点大幅减少,而SCH23390和雷氯必利可完全保护D1和D2受体免受EEDQ诱导的烷基化作用。行为结果表明,在断奶前大鼠中,D1和D2受体刺激对于可卡因敏化作用的诱导均非必需。EEDQ破坏了敏化过程,这表明诱导过程需要另一种对EEDQ烷基化敏感的受体类型。急性注射D1受体拮抗剂可阻止敏化反应的表达。除了少数例外情况,断奶前大鼠中多巴胺拮抗剂诱导效应的模式与给成年大鼠施用相同药物时所观察到的情况相似。因此,似乎D1和D2受体系统的成熟变化并非可卡因敏化行为表现个体发育差异的原因。