Suppr超能文献

用EEDQ灭活后纹状体多巴胺D1和D2受体恢复速率的年龄依赖性差异。

Age-dependent differences in the rate of recovery of striatal dopamine D1 and D2 receptors after inactivation with EEDQ.

作者信息

Crawford C A, Rowlett J K, McDougall S A, Bardo M T

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington 40506.

出版信息

Eur J Pharmacol. 1994 Feb 3;252(2):225-31. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(94)90601-7.

Abstract

Recovery of striatal dopamine D1 and D2 binding sites in 10-, 16-, and 39-day-old rats was measured 1, 2, 4, and 8 days after irreversible antagonism with N-ethoxycarbonyl-2-ethoxy-1,2-dihydroquinoline (EEDQ). Ontogenetic and EEDQ-induced changes in D1 and D2 binding sites were determined by Scatchard analyses using six concentrations of either [3H]SCH 23390 or [3H]spiperone. Twenty-four hours after EEDQ (7.5 mg/kg) treatment, a significant depletion of both dopamine D1 and D2 receptors was found for all age groups; however, the magnitude of the depletion was greater in 39-day-old rats than in the two preweanling age groups. Both 16- and 39-day-old rats showed significant recovery of dopamine D1 and D2 receptors by the eighth day after EEDQ treatment, but the 16-day-old rats showed a faster recovery of dopamine D1 receptors than did the 39-day-olds. Unexpectedly, 10-day-old rats did not show any evidence of receptor recovery, as the percent control values for these animals did not change across the 8-day recovery period. Pretreatment with the dopamine D1 receptor antagonist SCH 23390 and the dopamine D2 receptor antagonist sulpiride was sufficient to protect dopamine D1 and D2 receptors from EEDQ-induced inactivation. Protein values and receptor affinity (pKd values) were not affected by EEDQ treatment at any of the ages tested. Therefore, these results indicate that the rate of dopamine receptor repopulation varies across ontogeny, with 10-day-old rats exhibiting slower recovery than older rat pups or postweanling rats.

摘要

在使用N - 乙氧羰基 - 2 - 乙氧基 - 1,2 - 二氢喹啉(EEDQ)进行不可逆拮抗作用后的第1、2、4和8天,测量了10日龄、16日龄和39日龄大鼠纹状体多巴胺D1和D2结合位点的恢复情况。使用六种浓度的[³H]SCH 23390或[³H]螺哌隆,通过Scatchard分析确定D1和D2结合位点的个体发育变化以及EEDQ诱导的变化。在EEDQ(7.5 mg/kg)处理24小时后,所有年龄组的多巴胺D1和D2受体均出现显著耗竭;然而,39日龄大鼠的耗竭程度大于两个断奶前年龄组。16日龄和39日龄大鼠在EEDQ处理后第8天均显示多巴胺D1和D2受体有显著恢复,但16日龄大鼠的多巴胺D1受体恢复速度比39日龄大鼠快。出乎意料的是,10日龄大鼠没有显示出任何受体恢复的迹象,因为这些动物的对照值百分比在8天的恢复期内没有变化。用多巴胺D1受体拮抗剂SCH 23390和多巴胺D2受体拮抗剂舒必利预处理足以保护多巴胺D1和D2受体免受EEDQ诱导的失活。在所测试的任何年龄,蛋白质值和受体亲和力(pKd值)均不受EEDQ处理的影响。因此,这些结果表明,多巴胺受体再填充的速率在个体发育过程中有所不同,10日龄大鼠的恢复速度比年龄较大的幼鼠或断奶后大鼠慢。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验