Dichtel Laura E, Yuen Kevin C J, Bredella Miriam A, Gerweck Anu V, Russell Brian M, Riccio Ariana D, Gurel Michelle H, Sluss Patrick M, Biller Beverly M K, Miller Karen K
Neuroendocrine Unit (L.E.D., B.M.K.B., K.K.M.) and Department of Radiology (M.A.B.), Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114; Neuroendocrine Unit (A.V.G., B.M.R., A.D.R., M.H.G.) and Clinical Pathology Core Laboratory (P.M.S.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114; and Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Clinical Nutrition (K.C.J.Y.), Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014 Dec;99(12):4712-9. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-2830.
Obesity is associated with diminished GH secretion, which may result in the overdiagnosis of adult GH deficiency (GHD) in overweight/obese pituitary patients. However, there are no body mass index (BMI)-specific peak GH cutoffs for the glucagon stimulation test (GST), the favored dynamic test for assessing adult GHD in the United States.
The objective of the study was to determine a peak GH cutoff level for the diagnosis of adult GHD in overweight/obese individuals using the GST.
This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study.
The study was conducted at Massachusetts General Hospital and Oregon Health and Science University.
A total of 108 subjects with a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m(2) were studied: healthy controls (n = 47), subjects with total pituitary deficiency (TPD) (n = 20, ≥ 3 non-GH pituitary hormone deficiencies), and subjects with partial pituitary deficiency (PPD) (n = 41, 1-2 non-GH pituitary hormone deficiencies).
The intervention consisted of a standard 4-hour GST.
The main outcome measure was peak GH level on GST.
Using the standard peak GH cutoff of 3 ng/mL, 95% of TPD cases (19 of 20), 80% of PPD (33 of 41), and 45% of controls (21 of 47) were classified as GHD. In receiver-operator characteristic curve analysis (controls vs TPD), a peak GH value of 0.94 ng/mL provided the greatest sensitivity (90%) and specificity (94%). Using a peak GH cutoff of 1 ng/mL, 6% of controls (3 of 47), 59% of PPDs (24 of 41), and 90% of TPDs (18 of 20) were classified as GHD. BMI (R = -0.35, P = .02) and visceral adipose tissue (R = -0.32, P = .03) negatively correlated with peak GH levels in controls.
A large proportion of healthy overweight/obese individuals (45%) failed the GST using the standard 3 ng/mL GH cutoff. Overweight/obese pituitary patients are at risk of being misclassified as GHD using this cutoff level. A 1-ng/mL GH cutoff may reduce the overdiagnosis of adult GHD in overweight/obese patients.
肥胖与生长激素(GH)分泌减少有关,这可能导致超重/肥胖垂体疾病患者被过度诊断为成人生长激素缺乏症(GHD)。然而,对于胰高血糖素刺激试验(GST),即美国评估成人GHD时常用的动态试验,尚无针对体重指数(BMI)的特定GH峰值临界值。
本研究的目的是使用GST确定超重/肥胖个体诊断成人GHD的GH峰值临界水平。
这是一项回顾性横断面研究。
该研究在马萨诸塞州总医院和俄勒冈健康与科学大学进行。
共研究了108名BMI≥25kg/m²的受试者:健康对照者(n = 47)、全垂体功能减退(TPD)受试者(n = 20,≥3种非GH垂体激素缺乏)和部分垂体功能减退(PPD)受试者(n = 41,1 - 2种非GH垂体激素缺乏)。
干预措施为标准的4小时GST。
主要观察指标为GST时的GH峰值水平。
使用标准的GH峰值临界值3ng/mL时,95%的TPD病例(20例中的19例)、80%的PPD病例(41例中的33例)和45%的对照者(47例中的21例)被归类为GHD。在受试者工作特征曲线分析(对照者与TPD)中,GH峰值为0.94ng/mL时具有最高的敏感性(90%)和特异性(94%)。使用GH峰值临界值1ng/mL时,6%的对照者(47例中的3例)、59%的PPD患者(41例中的24例)和90%的TPD患者(20例中的18例)被归类为GHD。在对照者中,BMI(R = -0.35,P = 0.02)和内脏脂肪组织(R = -0.32,P = 0.03)与GH峰值水平呈负相关。
使用标准的3ng/mL GH临界值时,很大一部分健康的超重/肥胖个体(45%)GST结果异常。使用此临界水平,超重/肥胖垂体疾病患者有被误分类为GHD的风险。1ng/mL的GH临界值可能会减少超重/肥胖患者成人GHD的过度诊断。