Bener Abdulbari, Keskin Fatma Ela, Kurtulus Eda M, Guzel Mustafa, Çekirdekçi Elif I, Kadıoğlu Pınar, Konukoğlu Dildar, Öztürk Mustafa
Dept. of Biostatistics & Medical Informatics, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey; Dept. of Evidence for Population Health Unit, School of Epidemiology and Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Medipol International School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Division of Endocrinology-Metabolism and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2017 Nov;11 Suppl 1:S315-S320. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
The aim was to explore the association between Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [T2DM] treatment satisfactions of patients regarding their socio-economic, life-style, history medication and clinical outcome in a Turkish population SUBJECT AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study conducted from February 2016 to September 2016. Of the total 1500 diabetic patients approached, 1094 (72.9%) gave their consent. Data analysis included, sociodemographic, serum lipid profiles (LDL, HDL), calcium, uric acid, blood pressure and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) at baseline and after six months. The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) tools were used to measure the patient satisfaction.
The mean and standard deviation of age among gender, there were significant differences between males (51.81±14.40) and females (49.76±13.99) (p=0.024). There were statistically significant differences between males and females regarding place of living (city 76% vs town 26%) p<0.001) and consanguinity (p=0.040). Almost of the patients with diabetes were overweight (males 44.5% vs females 41.8%) while more than a quarter (31.2%) males were obese. Among patients with diabetes, significantly larger proportion were treated for DM with insulin (females 28.8% vs males 22.5%) and 'insulin & oral anti diabetic drugs' (females 21.6% vs males 18.4%%; p<0.001) in comparison. Reported average sleeping haours was significantly more among males (6.5±1.1 vs. 6.1±1.2; p<0.001) than females. Males and females reported significantly greater improvements in mean values of blood glucose (-2.07 p<0.001; vs. -2.36; p=0.007), HbA1c (-1.72 p<0.001; vs. -1.47 p=0.038), potassium (+0.98 p<0.001; vs. +0.93 p<0.005); albumin (-3.38 p<0.001; vs. -3.60; p<0.001); billirubin (-0.69 p=0.049; vs. -0.98; p<0.001); uric acid (+11.9 p=0.017; vs. +14.3; p<0.001); systolic blood pressure (-3.86 p<0.001; vs. -3.2 p<0.001) and diastolic blood pressure (-3.17 p<0.001; vs. -3.2 p<0.001) in comparison to 6 months before. Multivariate stepwise regression analysis showed that the satisfaction DTSQ scores for HbA1c (p<0.001), h of sleep (p<0.001), neuropathy (p=0.007), diabetic education (p=0.014), SBP (mmHg) (p=0.021) DBP (mmHg) (p=0.028) were identified as significantly associated with higher treatment satisfaction.
The study confirms a positive correlation between diabetes patient's satisfaction with care and treatment. Females DM patients compared to males had a better satisfaction score with current treatment, unacceptably low blood glucose level, flexibility in treatment and understanding of DM.
旨在探讨土耳其人群中2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的治疗满意度与社会经济状况、生活方式、用药史及临床结局之间的关联。
于2016年2月至2016年9月进行了一项横断面研究。在总计1500名受访糖尿病患者中,1094名(72.9%)给予了同意。数据分析包括基线及六个月后的社会人口统计学信息、血脂谱(低密度脂蛋白、高密度脂蛋白)、钙、尿酸、血压及糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)。使用糖尿病治疗满意度问卷(DTSQ)工具来衡量患者满意度。
按性别划分的年龄均值及标准差显示,男性(51.81±14.40)与女性(49.76±13.99)之间存在显著差异(p=0.024)。男性与女性在居住地点(城市76%对城镇26%,p<0.001)及近亲关系方面存在统计学显著差异(p=0.040)。几乎所有糖尿病患者超重(男性44.5%对女性41.8%),而超过四分之一(31.2%)的男性肥胖。在糖尿病患者中,使用胰岛素治疗糖尿病的女性比例(28.8%)显著高于男性(22.5%),使用“胰岛素及口服降糖药”治疗的女性比例(21.6%)也显著高于男性(18.4%;p<0.001)。报告的平均睡眠时间男性(6.5±1.1对6.(此处原文有误,应为6.1±1.2);p<0.001)显著多于女性。与六个月前相比,男性和女性报告的血糖均值(-2.07,p<0.001;对-2.36,p=0.007)、HbA1c(-1.72,p<0.001;对-1.47,p=0.038)、钾(+0.98,p<0.001;对+0.93,p<0.005);白蛋白(-3.38,p<0.001;对-3.60,p<0.001);胆红素(-0.69,p=0.049;对-0.98,p<0.001);尿酸(+11.9,p=0.017;对+14.3,p<0.001);收缩压(-3.86,p<0.001;对-3.2,p<0.001)和舒张压(-3.17,p<0.001;对-3.2,p<0.001)均有显著改善。多因素逐步回归分析显示,HbA1c(p<0.001)、睡眠时间(p<0.001)、神经病变(p=0.007)、糖尿病教育(p=0.014)、收缩压(mmHg)(p=0.021)、舒张压(mmHg)(p=0.028)的满意度DTSQ评分与更高的治疗满意度显著相关。
该研究证实糖尿病患者对护理和治疗的满意度之间存在正相关。与男性相比,女性糖尿病患者对当前治疗、血糖水平控制不佳、治疗灵活性及糖尿病理解方面的满意度得分更高。