Boels Anne Meike, Vos Rimke C, Hermans Tom G T, Zuithoff Nicolaas P A, Müller Nicolle, Khunti Kamlesh, Rutten Guy E H M
Department of General Practice, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Faculty of Medicine, University Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 11;7(7):e016180. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016180.
Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) on insulin therapy are less satisfied with their diabetes treatment than those on oral hypoglycaemic therapies or lifestyle advice only. Determinants of satisfaction in patients with T2DM on insulin therapy are not clearly known. The aim of this study was to determine the association of treatment satisfaction with demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with T2DM.
For this study we used data from the GUIDANCE (Guideline Adherence to Enhance Care) study, a cross-sectional study among 7597 patients with T2DM patients from Belgium, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Sweden, the Netherlands and the UK. The majority of patients were recruited from primary care. Treatment satisfaction was assessed by the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ, score 0-36; higher scores reflecting higher satisfaction). To determine which patient characteristics and laboratory values were independently associated with treatment satisfaction, a linear mixed model analysis was used.
In total, 1984 patients on insulin were analysed; the number of included patients per country ranged from 166 (the Netherlands) to 384 (Italy).
The mean DTSQ score was 28.50±7.52 and ranged from 25.93±6.57 (France) to 30.11±5.09 (the Netherlands). Higher DTSQ scores were associated with having received diabetes education (β 1.64, 95% CI 0.95 to 2.32), presence of macrovascular complications (β 0.76, 95% CI 0.21 to 1.31) and better health status (β 0.08 for every one unit increase on a 0-100 scale, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.10). Lower DTSQ scores were associated with more frequently perceived hyperglycaemia (β -0.32 for every 1 unit increase on a seven-point Likert scale, 95% CI -0.50 to -0.13), and higher glycated haemoglobin (β -0.52 for every percentage increase, 95% CI -0.75 to -0.29).
A number of factors including diabetes education, perceived and actual hyperglycaemia and macrovascular complications are associated with treatment satisfaction. Self-management education programmes should incorporate these factors for ongoing support in patients with T2DM.
接受胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者对糖尿病治疗的满意度低于仅接受口服降糖治疗或生活方式建议的患者。目前尚不清楚接受胰岛素治疗的T2DM患者满意度的决定因素。本研究的目的是确定治疗满意度与T2DM患者人口统计学和临床特征之间的关联。
在本研究中,我们使用了来自GUIDANCE(增强护理指南依从性)研究的数据,这是一项对来自比利时、法国、德国、爱尔兰、意大利、瑞典、荷兰和英国的7597例T2DM患者进行的横断面研究。大多数患者是从初级保健机构招募的。通过糖尿病治疗满意度问卷(DTSQ,评分0 - 36;分数越高反映满意度越高)评估治疗满意度。为了确定哪些患者特征和实验室值与治疗满意度独立相关,我们使用了线性混合模型分析。
总共分析了1984例接受胰岛素治疗的患者;每个国家纳入的患者数量从166例(荷兰)到384例(意大利)不等。
DTSQ平均得分为28.50±7.52,范围从25.93±6.57(法国)到30.11±5.09(荷兰)。较高的DTSQ得分与接受糖尿病教育(β 1.64,95%CI 0.95至2.32)、存在大血管并发症(β 0.76,95%CI 0.21至1.31)以及更好的健康状况(在0 - 100量表上每增加一个单位β 0.08,95%CI 0.07至0.10)相关。较低的DTSQ得分与更频繁感知到的高血糖(在七点李克特量表上每增加1个单位β -0.32,95%CI -0.50至 -0.13)以及更高的糖化血红蛋白(每增加一个百分点β -0.52,95%CI -0.75至 -0.29)相关。
包括糖尿病教育、感知和实际的高血糖以及大血管并发症在内的一些因素与治疗满意度相关。自我管理教育项目应纳入这些因素,以便为T2DM患者提供持续支持。