Department of Pharmacology, Physiology Research Center, School of Pharmacy, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences (AJUMS), Ahvaz, Iran.
Department of Pharmacology, Pain Research Center, School of Pharmacy, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences (AJUMS), Ahvaz, Iran.
Eur J Pharmacol. 2017 Jun 15;805:84-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
Nitric oxide (NO) is involved in numerous physiological processes of the central and peripheral nervous system. This study aimed to evaluate the involvement of PPARγ and NO pathway in the systemic and peripheral antinociceptive effect pioglitazone (Pio) using formalin test in rats. After allocation, rats were injected with 2.5% formalin solution and the flinching behaviors were recorded for 5min (phase 1) and 15-60min (phase 2). Pioglitazone was administered intraperitoneally (i.p.) at doses (10-50mg/kg) and intraplantarly (i.pl.) at doses (10-30μg/paw) 60 and 20min before test, respectively. To investigate the mechanism involved, rats were given GW-9662 (a PPARγ antagonist), -NAME (NO synthase inhibitor), -arginine (NO precursor), or l-NAME+GW-9662 along with pioglitazone. Results showed that both of i.p. and i.pl. routes of pioglitazone administration produced antinociception in both phases of formalin-induced pain. Antinociception caused by i.p. and i.pl. pioglitazone was blocked by GW-9662 at doses 2mg/kg (i.p.) and 3μg/paw (i.pl.) in both phases of the test, respectively. The antinociceptive effects of i.p. and i.pl. pioglitazone were significantly reduced by l-arginine, but were augmented by l-NAME in second phase of test. However, pre-treatment with GW-9662 inhibited the enhanced antinociceptive effect of l-NAME on pioglitazone in second phase of formalin test during i.p. and i.pl. administration. Furthermore, the antinociceptive effect of systemic pioglitazone was antagonized by i.pl. administration of GW-9662 (3μg/paw). Our data suggest that local and systemic antinociceptive activity of pioglitazone is mediated partly through PPARγ in collaboration with NO pathway. Moreover, the cumulative results suggest a close link of interaction between PPARγ and NO.
一氧化氮(NO)参与中枢和外周神经系统的许多生理过程。本研究旨在通过大鼠福尔马林试验评估过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ(PPARγ)和 NO 通路在吡格列酮(Pio)全身和外周镇痛作用中的作用。分配后,大鼠注射 2.5%福尔马林溶液,记录 5 分钟(第 1 阶段)和 15-60 分钟(第 2 阶段)的退缩行为。吡格列酮分别于试验前 60 和 20 分钟经腹腔(i.p.)给予(10-50mg/kg)和足底(i.pl.)给予(10-30μg/爪)。为了研究涉及的机制,大鼠给予 GW-9662(PPARγ 拮抗剂)、-NAME(一氧化氮合酶抑制剂)、-精氨酸(NO 前体)或 l-NAME+GW-9662 以及吡格列酮。结果表明,吡格列酮的 i.p.和 i.pl.给药途径均在福尔马林诱导疼痛的两个阶段产生镇痛作用。在试验的两个阶段,GW-9662 以 2mg/kg(i.p.)和 3μg/爪(i.pl.)的剂量分别阻断了 i.p.和 i.pl.吡格列酮引起的镇痛作用。i.p.和 i.pl.吡格列酮的镇痛作用均显著被 l-精氨酸降低,但在第二阶段试验中被 l-NAME 增强。然而,GW-9662 的预处理抑制了 i.p.和 i.pl.给药时 l-NAME 对吡格列酮在第二阶段福尔马林试验中的增强镇痛作用。此外,全身吡格列酮的镇痛作用被 i.pl.给予 GW-9662(3μg/爪)拮抗。我们的数据表明,吡格列酮的局部和全身镇痛活性部分通过与 NO 通路协同作用的 PPARγ 介导。此外,累积结果表明 PPARγ 和 NO 之间存在密切的相互作用联系。