Soper Tracey
POET Chamberlain College of Nursing Celebration Florida USA.
Nurs Open. 2016 Dec 20;4(2):76-83. doi: 10.1002/nop2.73. eCollection 2017 Apr.
The aim of this quantitative experimental study was to examine which of three instructional methodologies of traditional lecture, online electronic learning (e-learning) and self-study take-home packets are effective in knowledge acquisition of professional registered nurses.
A true experimental design was conducted to contrast the knowledge acquisition of 87 registered nurses randomly selected.
A 40-item Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) true/false test was used to measure knowledge acquisition. Based on 0.05 significance level, the ANOVA test revealed that there was no difference in knowledge acquisition by registered nurses based on which of three learning instructional method they were assigned. It can be concluded that while all of these instructional methods were equally effective in knowledge acquisition, these methods may not be equally cost- and time-effective.
The study was able to determine that there were no significant differences in knowledge acquisition of nurses between the three instructional methodologies. The study also found that all groups scored at the acceptable level for certification. It can be concluded that all of these instructional methods were equally effective in knowledge acquisition but are not equally cost- and time-effective. Therefore, hospital educators may wish to formulate policies regarding choice of instructional method that take into account the efficient use of nurses' time and institutional resources.
本定量实验研究旨在考察传统讲座、在线电子学习(电子学习)和自学带回家资料包这三种教学方法中,哪一种在专业注册护士的知识获取方面是有效的。
采用真实验设计,对比随机选取的87名注册护士的知识获取情况。
使用一份包含40道题目的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)是非测试来衡量知识获取情况。基于0.05的显著性水平,方差分析测试表明,根据分配给注册护士的三种学习教学方法中的哪一种,他们在知识获取方面没有差异。可以得出结论,虽然所有这些教学方法在知识获取方面同样有效,但这些方法在成本和时间效益方面可能并不相同。
该研究能够确定三种教学方法在护士知识获取方面没有显著差异。该研究还发现,所有组在认证的可接受水平上得分。可以得出结论,所有这些教学方法在知识获取方面同样有效,但在成本和时间效益方面并不相同。因此,医院教育工作者可能希望制定关于教学方法选择的政策,同时考虑到护士时间和机构资源的有效利用。