Suppr超能文献

知识转化为学习:比较讲座、电子学习和自学资料包教学方法在护士群体中的应用

Knowledge into learning: comparing lecture, e-learning and self-study take-home packet instructional methodologies with nurses.

作者信息

Soper Tracey

机构信息

POET Chamberlain College of Nursing Celebration Florida USA.

出版信息

Nurs Open. 2016 Dec 20;4(2):76-83. doi: 10.1002/nop2.73. eCollection 2017 Apr.

Abstract

AIM

The aim of this quantitative experimental study was to examine which of three instructional methodologies of traditional lecture, online electronic learning (e-learning) and self-study take-home packets are effective in knowledge acquisition of professional registered nurses.

DESIGN

A true experimental design was conducted to contrast the knowledge acquisition of 87 registered nurses randomly selected.

METHODS

A 40-item Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) true/false test was used to measure knowledge acquisition. Based on 0.05 significance level, the ANOVA test revealed that there was no difference in knowledge acquisition by registered nurses based on which of three learning instructional method they were assigned. It can be concluded that while all of these instructional methods were equally effective in knowledge acquisition, these methods may not be equally cost- and time-effective.

RESULTS

The study was able to determine that there were no significant differences in knowledge acquisition of nurses between the three instructional methodologies. The study also found that all groups scored at the acceptable level for certification. It can be concluded that all of these instructional methods were equally effective in knowledge acquisition but are not equally cost- and time-effective. Therefore, hospital educators may wish to formulate policies regarding choice of instructional method that take into account the efficient use of nurses' time and institutional resources.

摘要

目的

本定量实验研究旨在考察传统讲座、在线电子学习(电子学习)和自学带回家资料包这三种教学方法中,哪一种在专业注册护士的知识获取方面是有效的。

设计

采用真实验设计,对比随机选取的87名注册护士的知识获取情况。

方法

使用一份包含40道题目的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)是非测试来衡量知识获取情况。基于0.05的显著性水平,方差分析测试表明,根据分配给注册护士的三种学习教学方法中的哪一种,他们在知识获取方面没有差异。可以得出结论,虽然所有这些教学方法在知识获取方面同样有效,但这些方法在成本和时间效益方面可能并不相同。

结果

该研究能够确定三种教学方法在护士知识获取方面没有显著差异。该研究还发现,所有组在认证的可接受水平上得分。可以得出结论,所有这些教学方法在知识获取方面同样有效,但在成本和时间效益方面并不相同。因此,医院教育工作者可能希望制定关于教学方法选择的政策,同时考虑到护士时间和机构资源的有效利用。

相似文献

4
To Lecture or Not to Lecture? That is the Question.讲还是不讲?这是个问题。
J Nurses Prof Dev. 2016 Jan-Feb;32(1):21-5. doi: 10.1097/NND.0000000000000216.

引用本文的文献

4
Nurses' Use and Ways of Understanding Web-Based National Guidelines for Child Healthcare.
Comput Inform Nurs. 2020 Feb;38(2):62-70. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000578.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验