Ravesloot Craig, White Glen W, Gonda-Kotani Chiaki, Shinnick Kelsey
a Research and Training Center on Disability in Rural Communities, University of Montana , Missoula , Montana , USA.
b Research and Training Center on Independent Living, University of Kansas , Lawrence , Kansas , USA.
J Prev Interv Community. 2017 Apr-Jun;45(2):100-111. doi: 10.1080/10852352.2017.1281047.
Community living of people with disabilities spans independent living and community engagement. Consumer choice and control of their level of community participation requires community accessibility, resources and supports. Some people with disabilities have difficulties procuring and maintaining these resources. Centers for Independent Living (CIL) are advocacy and service agencies that have been empowering consumers to meet their needs for over 40 years. Despite this history, little is known about the value of CIL services for increasing community participation of people with disabilities. We administered the CIL Participation Service Survey to 420 CIL staff members and 107 CIL board members to examine their opinions about the relative value of different CIL services for increasing community participation of their consumers. Results indicated that both staff and board members have very high regard for the value and quality of CIL services. The Independent Living (IL) philosophy of consumer choice and control was among the most highly rated aspects of CIL service delivery for both staff and board members. Overall, staff and board member responses were very consistent in terms of the top-rated strengths and weaknesses of CIL services for increasing participation among consumers. Differences appeared to reflect the daily staff focus on specific consumer need versus board members' view of larger community issues.
残疾人的社区生活涵盖独立生活和社区参与。消费者对其社区参与程度的选择和控制需要社区的可达性、资源和支持。一些残疾人在获取和维持这些资源方面存在困难。独立生活中心(CIL)是倡导和服务机构,40多年来一直在帮助消费者满足他们的需求。尽管有这段历史,但对于独立生活中心服务在增加残疾人社区参与方面的价值却知之甚少。我们对420名独立生活中心工作人员和107名独立生活中心董事会成员进行了独立生活中心参与服务调查,以了解他们对不同独立生活中心服务在增加其消费者社区参与方面的相对价值的看法。结果表明,工作人员和董事会成员都非常重视独立生活中心服务的价值和质量。消费者选择和控制的独立生活(IL)理念在工作人员和董事会成员对独立生活中心服务提供的评价中都是得分很高的方面。总体而言,在独立生活中心服务促进消费者参与的最高评价的优势和劣势方面,工作人员和董事会成员的回答非常一致。差异似乎反映了工作人员日常关注特定消费者需求与董事会成员对更大社区问题的看法。