Newton Tamara L, Fernandez-Botran Rafael, Lyle Keith B, Szabo Yvette Z, Miller James J, Warnecke Ashlee J
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville.
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Louisville.
Emotion. 2017 Sep;17(6):1007-1020. doi: 10.1037/emo0000156. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
Elevated inflammation in the context of stress has been implicated in mental and physical health. Approaching this from an emotion regulation perspective, we tested whether the salivary cytokine response to stress is dampened by using distraction to minimize opportunity for poststressor rumination. Healthy young adults were randomized to an acute stressor: modified Trier Social Stress Test (TSST, Study 1) or angry memory retrieval (Study 2). Within each study, participants were randomized to poststressor condition-rest or distraction-at a 3:1 ratio. Saliva, collected before and 40 min after the end of each stressor, was assayed for proinflammatory cytokines (PICs): interleukin-1β (IL-1β), TNF-α, and IL-6. Both stressors increased all PICs, and both provoked negative emotion. At 40 min post-TSST, salivary PIC increases did not differ between distraction and rest, but correlated positively with emotional reactivity to stress. At 40 min after memory retrieval, IL-1β increases and intrusive rumination were lower during distraction than rest, but did not correlate with emotional reactivity. Trait rumination and interference control mechanisms, also measured, played little role in PIC increases. Overall, after some stressors, some salivary cytokine responses are lower during distraction than rest. The roles of specific emotions, emotional intensity, and poststressor timing of saliva collection in this finding require clarification. Furthermore, the possibility of two affective paths to inflammation in the context of stress-one sensitive to opportunities for early occurring emotion regulation (as reflected in emotional reactivity), and one sensitive to late-occurring emotion regulation (as reflected in distraction after stress)-deserves attention. (PsycINFO Database Record
压力情境下炎症水平升高与身心健康有关。从情绪调节的角度出发,我们测试了通过分散注意力以减少压力源后反复思考的机会,是否能抑制唾液细胞因子对压力的反应。健康的年轻成年人被随机分配到一种急性压力源中:改良的特里尔社会压力测试(TSST,研究1)或愤怒记忆提取(研究2)。在每项研究中,参与者以3:1的比例被随机分配到压力源后的状态——休息或分散注意力。在每个压力源结束前和结束后40分钟收集唾液,检测促炎细胞因子(PICs):白细胞介素-1β(IL-1β)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)和白细胞介素-6(IL-6)。两种压力源均增加了所有PICs,且都引发了负面情绪。在TSST后40分钟,分散注意力组和休息组的唾液PICs增加量没有差异,但与对压力的情绪反应呈正相关。在记忆提取后40分钟,分散注意力组的IL-1β增加量和侵入性反复思考低于休息组,但与情绪反应无关。同时测量的特质性反复思考和干扰控制机制在PICs增加中作用不大。总体而言,在经历某些压力源后,分散注意力时的一些唾液细胞因子反应低于休息时。这一发现中特定情绪、情绪强度和压力源后唾液收集时间的作用需要进一步阐明。此外,在压力情境下炎症的两条情感路径——一条对早期情绪调节机会敏感(如情绪反应所示),另一条对后期情绪调节敏感(如压力后的分散注意力所示)——值得关注。(PsycINFO数据库记录)