Akers Laura, Rohde Paul, Stice Eric, Butryn Meghan L, Shaw Heather
a Oregon Research Institute , Eugene , Oregon , USA.
b Department of Psychology , Drexel University , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , USA.
Eat Disord. 2017 May-Jun;25(3):263-272. doi: 10.1080/10640266.2017.1297107. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
Using data from an effectiveness trial delivered by college clinicians, we examined the cost-effectiveness of the dissonance-based Body Project program for reducing eating disorder symptoms in women with body dissatisfaction. The outcome of interest was individual-level change; 14.9% of Body Project participants attained clinically meaningful improvement vs. 6.7% of controls. Delivering the intervention costs approximately $70 (2012 U.S. dollars) per person. Incremental cost-effectiveness was $838 for each additional at-risk person reducing eating disorder symptomology to a clinically meaningful degree. These analyses demonstrate the economic value of the Body Project for college-age women with symptoms below the eating disorder diagnosis threshold.
利用大学临床医生进行的一项有效性试验的数据,我们研究了基于认知失调的“身体计划”项目在减轻身体不满的女性饮食失调症状方面的成本效益。感兴趣的结果是个体层面的变化;14.9%的“身体计划”参与者在临床上取得了有意义的改善,而对照组这一比例为6.7%。实施该干预措施每人大约花费70美元(2012年美元)。每增加一名将饮食失调症状减轻到临床有意义程度的高危人群,增量成本效益为838美元。这些分析证明了“身体计划”对处于饮食失调诊断阈值以下症状的大学适龄女性的经济价值。