Hartman Esther, Smith Joanne, Houwen Suzanne, Visscher Chris
University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Human Movement Sciences, Section F, P. O. Box 196, 9700 AD Groningen, The Netherlands.
University of Groningen, Department of Special Needs Education and Youth Care, Grote Rozenstraat 38, 9712 TJ Groningen, The Netherlands.
Res Dev Disabil. 2017 May;64:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2017.03.001. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
Children with intellectual disabilities (ID) or borderline intellectual disabilities (BIF) often demonstrate impairments in executive functioning (EF). Studies in typically developing children show that aerobic fitness (AF) is positively related with EF. Skill-related physical fitness (SF) might, however, be a stronger predictor of EF than AF, as cognitive challenges are inherent in application of these skills. In this study, AF and SF were examined simultaneously in relationship with domains of EF in children with ID or BIF. Seventy-three children (age range 8-11; 51 boys) with ID (IQ range 56-79) or BIF (IQ range 71-79) were measured annually over a period of 4 years on AF (20-m endurance shuttle run test) and SF (plate tapping and 10×5m run). EF was measured with the Stroop Color-Word test (inhibition), Trailmaking and Fluency test (cognitive flexibility), Self-ordered pointing task (working memory) and the Tower of London (planning). Multilevel models showed that SF was significantly associated with inhibition and both measures of cognitive flexibility, but in the same models no significant associations between AF and EF were found. In addition, age was significantly related to working memory and cognitive flexibility, favouring the older children. In children with ID or BIF, SF is of greater importance than AF in relationship with core domains of EF.
患有智力残疾(ID)或边缘智力残疾(BIF)的儿童往往表现出执行功能(EF)受损。对发育正常儿童的研究表明,有氧适能(AF)与EF呈正相关。然而,与技能相关的体适能(SF)可能比AF更能预测EF,因为这些技能的应用本身就存在认知挑战。在本研究中,对患有ID或BIF的儿童同时考察了AF和SF与EF各领域之间的关系。对73名年龄在8至11岁之间(51名男孩)、患有ID(智商范围为56 - 79)或BIF(智商范围为71 - 79)的儿童,在4年的时间里每年测量其AF(20米耐力穿梭跑测试)和SF(拍板测试和10×5米跑)。通过Stroop颜色-文字测试(抑制)、连线测试和流畅性测试(认知灵活性)、自我排序指向任务(工作记忆)以及伦敦塔测试(计划)来测量EF。多层次模型显示,SF与抑制以及两种认知灵活性测量指标均显著相关,但在相同模型中未发现AF与EF之间存在显著关联。此外,年龄与工作记忆和认知灵活性显著相关,年龄较大的儿童表现更优。在患有ID或BIF的儿童中,SF在与EF核心领域的关系中比AF更为重要。