Parra Mario A, Sánchez Manuel Guillermo, Valencia Stella, Trujillo Natalia
a School of Social Sciences, Psychology , Heriot Watt University , Edinburgh , UK.
b Dneuropsy, Psychology , Surcolombiana University , Huila , Colombia.
Cogn Emot. 2018 Mar;32(2):275-285. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2017.1298994. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
Attention is biased towards threat-related stimuli. In three experiments, we investigated the mechanisms, processes, and time course of this processing bias. An emotional flanker task simultaneously presented affective or neutral pictures from the international affective picture system database either as central response-relevant stimuli or surrounding response-uninformative flankers. Participants' response times to central stimuli was measured. The attentional bias was observed when stimuli were presented either for 1500 ms (Experiment 1) or 500 ms (Experiment 2). The threat-related attentional bias held regardless of the stimuli competing for attention even when presentation time was further reduced to 200 ms (Experiment 3). The results indicate that automatic and controlled mechanisms may interact to modulate the orientation of attention to threat. The data presented here shed new light on the mechanisms, processes, and time course of this long investigated by still largely unknown processing bias.
注意力偏向与威胁相关的刺激。在三个实验中,我们研究了这种加工偏向的机制、过程和时间进程。一项情绪侧翼任务同时呈现来自国际情感图片系统数据库的情感或中性图片,这些图片要么作为与中央反应相关的刺激,要么作为周围不提供反应信息的侧翼刺激。测量了参与者对中央刺激的反应时间。当刺激呈现1500毫秒(实验1)或500毫秒(实验2)时,观察到了注意力偏向。即使将呈现时间进一步缩短至200毫秒(实验3),与威胁相关的注意力偏向仍然存在,无论竞争注意力的刺激是什么。结果表明,自动机制和控制机制可能相互作用,以调节对威胁的注意力定向。这里呈现的数据为这种长期研究但仍 largely unknown的加工偏向的机制、过程和时间进程提供了新的线索。 (注:“largely unknown”这里按字面意思保留了,感觉原文这里表述有误,也许是“largely unknown”应改为其他正确表述)