Tanaka Yoshiya, Yamanaka Hisashi, Ishiguro Naoki, Miyasaka Nobuyuki, Kawana Katsuyoshi, Kimura Junko, Agata Naoki, Takeuchi Tsutomu
The First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Yahatanishi-ku, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, 807-8555, Japan.
Institute of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1, Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8666, Japan.
Arthritis Res Ther. 2017 Mar 14;19(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13075-017-1264-6.
This study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility of long-term adalimumab (ADA) discontinuation after achievement of low disease activity (LDA) in Japanese patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to identify predictors of LDA maintenance.
In the HOPEFUL-1 study, patients received initial therapy with either ADA plus methotrexate (MTX; intensive therapy) or MTX alone (standard therapy) for 26 weeks, followed by ADA + MTX for 26 weeks. In the HOPEFUL-2 study, patients received ADA + MTX (ADA continuation) or MTX alone (ADA discontinuation) for 52 weeks. HOPEFUL-3 was an observational study that enrolled patients who had completed HOPEFUL-2; these patients were followed for an additional 104 weeks.
Of the 172 patients enrolled in the HOPEFUL-3 study, 135 (ADA continuation, n = 61; ADA discontinuation, n = 74) with 28-joint Disease Activity Score using C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) values at both week 52 (start of HOPEFUL-2) and week 208 (end of HOPEFUL-3) were included in the effectiveness analysis. At week 208, 58 (95.1%) of 61 patients and 59 (79.7%) of 74 patients who continued or discontinued ADA, respectively, had LDA (DAS28-CRP <3.2). Initial intensive therapy was associated with a better outcome than standard therapy in terms of change in modified total Sharp score from week 0 to week 208, which was ≤0.5 (64% vs. 30%). The incidence of adverse events was significantly lower in the ADA discontinuation group than in the ADA continuation group (9.7% vs. 32.9%; p < 0.001).
Approximately 80% of patients who discontinued ADA for 3 years after achieving LDA with ADA + MTX were still in LDA, with a lower incidence of adverse events than patients who continued ADA.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01346501. Registered 29 April 2011.
本研究旨在评估日本早期类风湿关节炎(RA)患者在达到低疾病活动度(LDA)后长期停用阿达木单抗(ADA)的可行性,并确定LDA维持的预测因素。
在HOPEFUL-1研究中,患者接受初始治疗,使用ADA加甲氨蝶呤(MTX;强化治疗)或单独使用MTX(标准治疗)26周,随后使用ADA + MTX治疗26周。在HOPEFUL-2研究中,患者接受ADA + MTX(继续使用ADA)或单独使用MTX(停用ADA)治疗52周。HOPEFUL-3是一项观察性研究,纳入完成HOPEFUL-2的患者;这些患者再随访104周。
在HOPEFUL-3研究纳入的172例患者中,135例(继续使用ADA组,n = 61;停用ADA组,n = 74)在第52周(HOPEFUL-2开始时)和第208周(HOPEFUL-3结束时)使用基于C反应蛋白的28个关节疾病活动评分(DAS28-CRP)值纳入有效性分析。在第208周,继续或停用ADA的患者中,分别有58例(61例中的95.1%)和59例(74例中的79.7%)达到LDA(DAS28-CRP < 3.2)。从第0周至第208周改良总Sharp评分变化方面,初始强化治疗比标准治疗结局更好,变化值≤0.5(64%对30%)。停用ADA组不良事件发生率显著低于继续使用ADA组(9.7%对32.9%;p < 0.001)。
在使用ADA + MTX达到LDA后停用ADA 3年的患者中,约80%仍处于LDA状态,且不良事件发生率低于继续使用ADA的患者。
ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT01346501。2011年4月29日注册。