Men Xi, Sun Wei, Fan Fangfang, Zhao Min, Huang Xiao, Wang Yu, Liu Lishun, Liu Ran, Sun Weiping, Peng Qing, Qin Xianhui, Tang Genfu, Li Jianping, Zhang Yan, Cai Yefeng, Hou Fan Fan, Wang Binyan, Xu Xiping, Cheng Xiaoshu, Sun Ningling, Huang Yining, Huo Yong
Department of Neurology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Department of Cardiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Mar 13;6(3):e004350. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004350.
The optimal range of blood pressure variability remains unclear. We aimed to stratify the degree of risk of stroke based on visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure (SBP) variability in a large Chinese hypertensive population in 32 communities.
We retrospectively analyzed the data of 20 702 hypertensive patients from the China Stroke Primary Prevention Trial. The participants were randomized into 2 treatment groups to receive either enalapril or enalapril plus folic acid. Their blood pressures were measured every 3 months. The outcome was the first stroke. Three parameters of SBP variability were calculated: standard deviation, coefficient of variation, and average real variability. The records of first 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 visits at which SBP was measured were used to calculate SBP variability and to predict subsequent stroke risk in adjusted Cox regression models. After median follow-up of 4.5 years, 597 patients had experienced stroke. Visit-to-visit SBP variability was an independent predictor of subsequent stroke (eg, the hazard ratio for the highest quintile of average real variability [22.67-61.07 mm Hg] over 6 visits was 1.55, 95% CI 1.07-2.25, =0.021), independent of mean SBP over the follow-up period. Its value was more predictive when more blood pressure records were used.
Visit-to-visit SBP variability is an independent predictor of primary stroke in Chinese hypertensive patients. This predictive value depends on the number of blood pressure measurements used to calculate variability but is independent of mean SBP.
URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00794885.
血压变异性的最佳范围仍不明确。我们旨在基于32个社区的一大群中国高血压患者的就诊间收缩压(SBP)变异性对中风风险程度进行分层。
我们回顾性分析了来自中国脑卒中一级预防试验的20702例高血压患者的数据。参与者被随机分为2个治疗组,分别接受依那普利或依那普利加叶酸治疗。每3个月测量一次他们的血压。结局为首次中风。计算了SBP变异性的三个参数:标准差、变异系数和平均实际变异性。使用测量SBP的前4、6、8、10和12次就诊记录来计算SBP变异性,并在调整后的Cox回归模型中预测随后的中风风险。中位随访4.5年后,597例患者发生了中风。就诊间SBP变异性是随后中风的独立预测因素(例如,6次就诊时平均实际变异性最高五分位数[22.67 - 61.07 mmHg]的风险比为1.55,95%CI 1.07 - 2.25,P = 0.021),独立于随访期间的平均SBP。当使用更多血压记录时,其预测价值更高。
就诊间SBP变异性是中国高血压患者原发性中风的独立预测因素。这种预测价值取决于用于计算变异性的血压测量次数,但独立于平均SBP。