Mahadevan D, Mita Monica, Richards Donald, McClay Edward, Heist Rebecca Suk, Kumar A, Sundararajan S, Naing Aung
University of Arizona Cancer Center, 1515, N. Campbell Avenue, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA.
Cedars Sinai Medical Center, 8737 Beverly Blvd. # 203, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2017 Apr;79(4):681-688. doi: 10.1007/s00280-017-3258-0. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
A phase I two-period two sequence cross-over study compared the bioavailability of two pimasertib (MSC1936369B/AS703026) formulations (capsule versus tablet) in advanced cancer patients.
Patients with advanced solid tumors were randomized to one of two treatment sequences utilizing pimasertib tablet (test; 3 × 20 mg, PO QD) and capsule (standard; 2 × 30 mg, PO QD). The trial comprised a screening and baseline period, two time periods or parts A and B, and a trial extension phase.
N = 38 patients were randomized to two treatment sequences S1 and S2. PK parameters t , CL/f, and V /f were within the same range for the two formulations. Tablet had bioavailability comparable to capsule based on the analysis of AUC, however, tablet administration resulted in an increase of ~25% in C versus capsule. Common predicted adverse events of pimasertib included ocular events, diarrhea and creatine phosphokinase elevation. Disease control rate was ~29% with 1 partial response and 4 of 10 patients with stable disease >4 months.
Pimasertib tablet was overall well tolerated, had a similar safety and efficacy profile to standard capsule formulation and had bioavailability comparable to capsule.
一项I期两周期两序列交叉研究比较了两种pimasertib(MSC1936369B/AS703026)制剂(胶囊与片剂)在晚期癌症患者中的生物利用度。
晚期实体瘤患者被随机分配至两种治疗序列之一,使用pimasertib片剂(试验制剂;3×20 mg,口服,每日一次)和胶囊(标准制剂;2×30 mg,口服,每日一次)。试验包括一个筛选和基线期、两个时间段或A和B部分,以及一个试验延长期。
38例患者被随机分配至两个治疗序列S1和S2。两种制剂的药代动力学参数t、CL/f和V/f在同一范围内。根据AUC分析,片剂的生物利用度与胶囊相当,然而,与胶囊相比,片剂给药导致Cmax增加约25%。pimasertib常见的预测不良事件包括眼部事件、腹泻和肌酸磷酸激酶升高。疾病控制率约为29%,有1例部分缓解,10例病情稳定>4个月的患者中有4例。
pimasertib片剂总体耐受性良好,与标准胶囊制剂具有相似的安全性和疗效,且生物利用度与胶囊相当。