Mercieca N, Portelli J L, Jadva-Patel H
Medical Imaging Department, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, MSD 2090, Malta.
Department of Radiography, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malta, Msida, MSD 2090, Malta.
Radiography (Lond). 2017 Feb;23(1):25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2016.07.004. Epub 2016 Aug 6.
Mammography is used as a first-line investigation in the detection of breast cancer and imaging is required to be of optimal quality and achieved without adverse effects on the health of individuals. Repeated images come at a cost in terms of radiation dose, discomfort to clients and unnecessary financial burdens. No studies investigating mammography quality in Malta had been previously undertaken. Hence, this research aimed to investigate whether mammography is being performed at an acceptable level, through the investigation of reject rates. Quantitative methodology was used to collect data from eight participating mammography units, which were utilising screen film (SFM), computed radiography (CR) and direct digital mammography (DDM). Data relating to the total number of images performed, rejects and causes was prospectively collected over two weeks, resulting in a sample of 2291 images. All units were also asked to answer a questionnaire which provided other data that could be used for analysis. The national mammography reject rate was found to be 2.62%; within the 3% acceptable range. Individual rates' analysis revealed unacceptably high or low reject rates in some units. Positioning was the main reject cause. No significant difference in rejection was found between different types of mammography units or radiographers' experience. Alternatively, radiographers' qualifications, employment conditions and use of rejection criteria were proven to affect reject rates. Whilst on a national level, images are being rejected at an acceptable rate, individual units revealed suboptimal rates; at the cost of extra radiation, added discomfort and financial burden.
乳腺钼靶摄影被用作乳腺癌检测的一线检查方法,要求成像质量达到最佳,且对个体健康无不良影响。重复成像会带来辐射剂量、受检者不适以及不必要的经济负担等成本。此前马耳他尚未开展过关于乳腺钼靶摄影质量的研究。因此,本研究旨在通过调查拒收率来探究乳腺钼靶摄影的执行水平是否可接受。采用定量方法从八个参与研究的乳腺钼靶摄影单位收集数据,这些单位使用的是屏片乳腺摄影(SFM)、计算机X线摄影(CR)和直接数字化乳腺摄影(DDM)。在两周内前瞻性收集了与成像总数、拒收情况及原因相关的数据,共得到2291幅图像的样本。所有单位还被要求回答一份问卷,该问卷提供了可用于分析的其他数据。结果发现全国乳腺钼靶摄影拒收率为2.62%,在3%的可接受范围内。对各单位拒收率的分析显示,部分单位的拒收率过高或过低,令人无法接受。体位摆放是主要的拒收原因。不同类型的乳腺钼靶摄影单位或放射技师的经验在拒收率上未发现显著差异。相反,放射技师的资质、工作条件以及拒收标准的使用被证明会影响拒收率。虽然从全国层面来看,图像拒收率处于可接受水平,但个别单位的表现欠佳,这带来了额外的辐射、更多的不适以及经济负担。