Wikstrom Erik A, McKeon Patrick O
Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Department of Exercise and Sport Sciences, Ithaca College, NY.
J Athl Train. 2017 Apr;52(4):325-331. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-52.2.07. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
Therapeutic modalities that stimulate sensory receptors around the foot-ankle complex improve chronic ankle instability (CAI)-associated impairments. However, not all patients have equal responses to these modalities. Identifying predictors of treatment success could improve clinician efficiency when treating patients with CAI.
To conduct a response analysis on existing data to identify predictors of improved self-reported function in patients with CAI.
Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Sports medicine research laboratories.
Fifty-nine patients with CAI, which was defined in accordance with the International Ankle Consortium recommendations.
INTERVENTION(S): Participants were randomized into 3 treatment groups (plantar massage [PM], ankle-joint mobilization [AJM], or calf stretching [CS]) that received six 5-minute treatments over 2 weeks.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Treatment success, defined as a patient exceeding the minimally clinically important difference of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure-Sport (FAAM-S).
Patients with ≤5 recurrent sprains and ≤82.73% on the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure had a 98% probability of having a meaningful FAAM-S improvement after AJM. As well, ≥5 balance errors demonstrated 98% probability of meaningful FAAM-S improvements from AJM. Patients <22 years old and with ≤9.9 cm of dorsiflexion had a 99% probability of a meaningful FAAM-S improvement after PM. Also, those who made ≥2 single-limb-stance errors had a 98% probability of a meaningful FAAM-S improvement from PM. Patients with ≤53.1% on the FAAM-S had an 83% probability of a meaningful FAAM-S improvement after CS.
Each sensory-targeted ankle-rehabilitation strategy resulted in a unique combination of predictors of success for patients with CAI. Specific indicators of success with AJM were deficits in self-reported function, single-limb balance, and <5 previous sprains. Age, weight-bearing-dorsiflexion restrictions, and single-limb balance deficits identified patients with CAI who will respond well to PM. Assessing self-reported sport-related function can identify CAI patients who will respond positively to CS.
刺激足踝复合体周围感觉受体的治疗方式可改善慢性踝关节不稳(CAI)相关功能障碍。然而,并非所有患者对这些治疗方式的反应都相同。识别治疗成功的预测因素可提高临床医生治疗CAI患者时的效率。
对现有数据进行反应分析,以识别CAI患者自我报告功能改善的预测因素。
一项随机对照临床试验的二次分析。
运动医学研究实验室。
59例CAI患者,根据国际踝关节联盟的建议进行定义。
参与者被随机分为3个治疗组(足底按摩[PM]、踝关节松动术[AJM]或小腿拉伸[CS]),在2周内接受6次每次5分钟的治疗。
治疗成功,定义为患者超过足踝能力测量-运动版(FAAM-S)的最小临床重要差异。
复发性扭伤≤5次且足踝能力测量得分≤82.73%的患者,接受AJM后FAAM-S有意义改善的概率为98%。同样,平衡误差≥5次表明接受AJM后FAAM-S有意义改善的概率为98%。年龄<22岁且背屈≤9.9 cm的患者,接受PM后FAAM-S有意义改善的概率为99%。此外,单腿站立误差≥2次的患者接受PM后FAAM-S有意义改善的概率为98%。FAAM-S得分≤53.1%的患者接受CS后FAAM-S有意义改善的概率为83%。
每种针对感觉的踝关节康复策略都为CAI患者带来了成功的独特预测因素组合。AJM成功的具体指标是自我报告功能、单腿平衡存在缺陷且既往扭伤<5次。年龄、负重背屈受限和单腿平衡缺陷可识别出对PM反应良好的CAI患者。评估自我报告的与运动相关的功能可识别出对CS反应积极的CAI患者。