Morgan Jessica Kelley, Hourani Laurel, Tueller Stephen
RTI International, 3040 Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194.
Mil Med. 2017 Mar;182(3):e1620-e1627. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00165.
Our previous research has highlighted the important link between coping behaviors and mental health symptoms in military personnel. This study seeks to extend these findings by examining each coping behavior and mental health issue individually. This study has four specific aims: (1) test cross-sectional relationships between coping and mental health at baseline and follow-up, (2) examine stability of each variable over time, (3) determine the predictive nature of baseline mental health and coping on subsequent mental health and coping, (4) assess the magnitude of each effect to evaluate the differential predictive value of coping behaviors and mental health symptoms.
A convenience sample of U.S. Army platoons of the 82nd Airborne was surveyed. We used a two-wave, cross-lagged autoregression design with structural equation modeling to disentangle elements of temporality and to examine the predictive value of mental health status vis-à-vis coping behaviors and vice versa. Separate analyses were performed with each coping strategy and each set of mental health symptoms. This design allowed for the analysis of two synchronous associations (i.e., cross-sectional correlations between the coping strategy and mental health symptoms at each time point), two autoregressive effects (i.e., baseline mental health predicting mental health at follow-up and baseline coping predicting coping at follow-up), and two cross-lagged effects (i.e., baseline coping strategy predicting mental health at follow-up and baseline mental health predicting follow-up coping).
Results of descriptive statistics revealed that the most frequently reported coping behavior was thinking of a plan to solve the problem, followed by talking to a friend, engaging in a hobby, and exercising or playing sports. The least often endorsed coping behaviors were smoking marijuana or using illicit drugs and thinking about hurting or killing oneself, followed by having a drink or lighting up a cigarette. We verified many cross-sectional relationships between coping behaviors and mental health symptoms. Specifically, talking to a friend, exercising or playing sports, engaging in a hobby, and thinking of a plan were associated with fewer anxiety, perceived stress, and depression symptoms, whereas smoking a cigarette, having a drink, and thinking about hurting or killing oneself were associated with more anxiety, perceived stress, and depressive symptoms. Marijuana and illicit drug use was also associated with higher depressive symptoms. Saying a prayer was not significantly related to mental health. Only four cross-lagged effects were significant. Those who reported more depressive symptoms at Time 1 reported talking to friends and family less and exercising or playing sports less as coping behaviors at Time 2. Baseline perceived stress predicted less likelihood of engaging in a hobby at follow-up, whereas exercising or playing sports as a coping behavior at baseline predicted lower perceived stress at follow-up.
This study expands the evidence for the associations between coping behaviors and psychological health or distress to specific mental health symptoms, particularly in military service members, and provides comparisons of magnitude of each association. Clinically, this knowledge is critical to more efficiently target behaviors with the greatest associations to mental health in military personnel.
我们之前的研究突出了军事人员应对行为与心理健康症状之间的重要联系。本研究旨在通过分别考察每种应对行为和心理健康问题来扩展这些发现。本研究有四个具体目标:(1)测试基线和随访时应对与心理健康之间的横断面关系;(2)考察每个变量随时间的稳定性;(3)确定基线心理健康和应对方式对后续心理健康和应对方式的预测性质;(4)评估每种效应的大小,以评估应对行为和心理健康症状的差异预测价值。
对第82空降师的美国陆军排进行了便利抽样调查。我们使用了带有结构方程模型的两波交叉滞后自回归设计,以理清时间因素,并考察心理健康状况对应对行为的预测价值,反之亦然。对每种应对策略和每组心理健康症状进行了单独分析。这种设计允许分析两个同步关联(即每个时间点应对策略与心理健康症状之间的横断面相关性)、两个自回归效应(即基线心理健康预测随访时的心理健康,基线应对方式预测随访时的应对方式)以及两个交叉滞后效应(即基线应对策略预测随访时的心理健康,基线心理健康预测随访时的应对方式)。
描述性统计结果显示,最常报告的应对行为是想出解决问题的计划,其次是与朋友交谈、从事爱好活动以及锻炼或进行体育运动。最不常被认可的应对行为是吸食大麻或使用非法药物以及考虑伤害自己或自杀,其次是喝酒或抽烟。我们验证了应对行为与心理健康症状之间的许多横断面关系。具体而言,与朋友交谈、锻炼或进行体育运动、从事爱好活动以及想出计划与较少的焦虑、感知压力和抑郁症状相关,而抽烟、喝酒以及考虑伤害自己或自杀与更多的焦虑、感知压力和抑郁症状相关。吸食大麻和使用非法药物也与较高的抑郁症状相关。祈祷与心理健康没有显著关系。只有四个交叉滞后效应是显著的。在时间1报告有更多抑郁症状的人在时间2报告与朋友和家人交谈以及锻炼或进行体育运动作为应对行为的次数较少。基线感知压力预测随访时从事爱好活动的可能性较小,而基线时将锻炼或进行体育运动作为应对行为预测随访时感知压力较低。
本研究将应对行为与心理健康或困扰之间关联的证据扩展到了特定的心理健康症状,尤其是在军事人员中,并提供了每种关联大小的比较。在临床上,这些知识对于更有效地针对与军事人员心理健康关联最大的行为至关重要。