Rossi Kristen, Nowak Gosia, Riegodedios Asha Jindal
EpiData Center, Navy and Marine Corps Public Health Center, 620 John Paul Jones Circle, Suite 100, Portsmouth, VA 23708-2103.
Preventive Medicine Program, Navy and Marine Corps Public Health Center, 620 John Paul Jones Circle, Suite 100, Portsmouth, VA 23708-2103.
Mil Med. 2017 Mar;182(3):e1733-e1740. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00034.
Acute respiratory infections are recognized as a significant source of morbidity for military populations, particularly for recruits. This analysis aims to describe the pneumonia burden at Marine Corps Recruit Depots (MCRD) in Parris Island and San Diego during 2007-2014, as these two depots maintain noteworthy comparisons in vaccine and prophylaxis policies. First, both depots reinstated the adenovirus vaccine in October 2011. Second, San Diego provides the pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine to all recruits within the first 2 days of arrival, although Parris Island does not routinely vaccinate for Streptococcus pneumoniae. Third, recruits at San Diego routinely receive three doses of penicillin G benzathine for group A Streptococcus bacterium prophylaxis, although those at Parris Island receive one dose year-round and a second dose during the winter months when group A Streptococcus bacterium burden is expected to increase.
Monthly pneumonia rates were estimated using diagnostic codes from ambulatory encounters and inpatient discharge records, and specific causative organisms were assessed using code extenders within the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision. Regression analyses and Spearman's correlation rank tests were used to describe significant trends and the relationship between ambulatory and inpatient rates at each depot.
Although our results indicate the majority of ambulatory encounters and inpatient discharges are attributed to unspecified pneumonia diagnostic codes at both locations, these data still lend noteworthy trends. At both locations, linear trends in ambulatory pneumonia rates significantly declined over the 8-year period, whereas inpatient rates demonstrated less variability and did not significantly decline. Both depots experienced prolonged, heightened pneumonia trends from early 2009-2010, a period which included the global influenza pandemic. Following reimplementation of the adenovirus vaccine during October 2011, the average ambulatory rates at MCRD San Diego (38.02 per 1,000 recruit-months vs. 65.59 per 1,000 recruit-months) and MCRD Parris Island (10.9 per 1,000 recruit-months vs. 22.8 per 1,000 recruit-months) were approximately half the average rate before utilization of the adenovirus vaccine. At MCRD San Diego, a weak correlation between monthly inpatient and ambulatory pneumonia rates suggests that trends for potentially severe pneumonia do not follow those for generalized disease (r = 0.43; p < 0.05), whereas correlation results at MCRD Parris Island indicate these monthly trends are positively associated (r = 0.71; p < 0.05).
These observations underscore the evidence that pneumonia burden among military recruits is not associated with one single etiology. Recruits are at risk for a range of etiologic agents, and control measures should include a combination of specific medical countermeasures that focus on a single bacterial or viral disease as well as nonmedical public health measures that reduce the overall burden of circulating infectious respiratory agents. The trends described in this report, coupled with the similarities and dissimilarities for public health prevention practices at each depot, may warrant further investigation for a systematic review of social and environmental factors within recruit populations at these two locations.
急性呼吸道感染被认为是军队人员发病的一个重要来源,对新兵尤其如此。本分析旨在描述2007 - 2014年期间帕里斯岛和圣地亚哥海军陆战队新兵训练营(MCRD)的肺炎负担情况,因为这两个训练营在疫苗和预防政策方面存在显著差异。首先,两个训练营均于2011年10月恢复了腺病毒疫苗接种。其次,圣地亚哥在新兵抵达后的头2天内为所有新兵接种肺炎球菌多糖疫苗,而帕里斯岛通常不为肺炎链球菌进行疫苗接种。第三,圣地亚哥的新兵常规接受3剂苄星青霉素G以预防A组链球菌感染,而帕里斯岛的新兵全年接受1剂,在预计A组链球菌感染负担会增加的冬季再接受第2剂。
使用门诊就诊和住院出院记录中的诊断代码估算每月肺炎发病率,并使用《国际疾病分类》第九版中的编码扩展器评估特定病原体。采用回归分析和Spearman相关秩检验来描述各训练营门诊和住院发病率的显著趋势及两者之间的关系。
尽管我们的结果表明,两个地点的大多数门诊就诊和住院出院病例归因于未明确的肺炎诊断代码,但这些数据仍呈现出值得关注的趋势。在两个地点,门诊肺炎发病率在8年期间均显著下降,而住院发病率的变异性较小且未显著下降。两个训练营在2009年初至2010年期间都经历了持续时间较长、肺炎发病率较高的趋势,这一时期包括全球流感大流行。2011年10月重新实施腺病毒疫苗接种后,圣地亚哥海军陆战队新兵训练营(每1000名新兵 - 月38.02例 vs. 接种腺病毒疫苗前每1000名新兵 - 月65.59例)和帕里斯岛海军陆战队新兵训练营(每1000名新兵 - 月10.9例 vs. 接种腺病毒疫苗前每1000名新兵 - 月22.8例)的平均门诊发病率约为使用腺病毒疫苗前平均发病率的一半。在圣地亚哥海军陆战队新兵训练营,每月住院和门诊肺炎发病率之间的相关性较弱,这表明潜在严重肺炎的趋势与一般疾病的趋势不同(r = 0.43;p < 0.05),而帕里斯岛海军陆战队新兵训练营的相关性结果表明这些月度趋势呈正相关(r = 0.71;p < 0.05)。
这些观察结果强调了这样的证据,即新兵中的肺炎负担并非与单一病因相关。新兵面临多种病原体的风险,控制措施应包括针对单一细菌或病毒疾病的特定医学应对措施以及减少循环感染性呼吸道病原体总体负担的非医学公共卫生措施。本报告中描述的趋势,以及每个训练营公共卫生预防措施的异同,可能有必要进一步调查,以便对这两个地点新兵群体中的社会和环境因素进行系统综述。